March 5, 2024 - Voter Information Guide 012

Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters, Elections

PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION
Tuesday, March 5, 2024

  • STATE INFORMATION

    Go to the California Secretary of State's website (opens a new window) for information about Presidential Candidates, U.S. Senate Candidates, and State Propositions.

    Office of United States Senate

    There are two U.S. Senate contests on the March 5, 2024, Presidential Primary Election ballot.

    • The first contest is the regular election for the full 6-year term ending January 3, 2031.
    • The second contest is a special vacancy election (the current officeholder is temporarily filling a vacancy) for the remainder of the current term ending January 3, 2025.

    You may vote for both contests

The information below is specific to you based on your home address.

If you prefer, download a PDF version of local information for the March 5, 2024 - Presidential Primary Election Voter Information Guide 012.

Open All Panels

 

Index

Endorsments

Candidate Endorsements by Qualified Political Parties

Political Party Endorsements are published pursuant to California Elections Code Sec. 13302(b). Parties may endorse candidates for voter-nominated offices.

  • Republican Party
    Office Candidates
    U.S. Representative District 2 Chris Coulombe
    State Assembly District 12 Andy Podshadley
  • Democratic Party
    Office Candidates
    U.S. Representative District 2 Jared Huffman
    State Assembly District 12 Damon Connolly
  • Libertarian Party
    Office Candidates
    U.S. Senate Gail Lightfoot
  • American Independent Party
    Office Candidates
    U.S. Senate James Bradley
    U.S. Representative District 2 Tief Gibbs
    State Assembly District 12 Eryn Cervantes

No other parties submitted endorsements.

Source: State political party central committee notification letters to Registrar of Voters as of December 13, 2023. Parties are listed in order according to the randomized alphabet drawing conducted by Marin County on December 14, 2023.

Candidate Statements

Submitting a candidate statement is optional, so this guide may not contain statements for all candidates. The statement is printed as submitted, and is printed at the expense of the candidate unless otherwise determined by the governing body.

STATEMENT OF CANDIDATES

  • STATE OFFICES
    • U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, District 2
      • TIEF GIBBS
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Small Businesswoman

          Education and Qualifications: I am a results-driven, America-First wife and businesswoman in Novato and mother of two grown children. I want to restore California so that our children can look forward to a bright future instead of planning their exit. I am running to restore California.
          I want to make California a state that companies want to do business in not flee from. Crime and homelessness are growing problems that effect our daily lives. We need to let cops and courts do their job. I want to stop warehousing homeless in tents and get them out of our parks and public spaces and instead get them reintegrated into society with compassionate solutions.
          Armed with my background in economics, I will seek prudent spending and balanced budgets. Environmental decisions must be based on sound science, not fear. The U.S. has a moral responsibility to properly manage our environment. We should take a free-market approach and be careful not to simply throw money at “green” policies that don’t work and could bankrupt us.
          We need to secure our southern border, stop the flow of fentanyl, rebuild our infrastructure, which includes water and power, and crack down on crime. I favor limiting the scope of government to emphasize personal responsibility. I want to live in a society of traditional family values and religious freedom. I support the right to bear arms. I represent the change that California needs. Together, we can restore California. I ask you to vote for Tief Gibbs.
          www.tief4congress.com

      • JARED HUFFMAN
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: U.S. Representative

          Education and Qualifications: I’m getting things done despite MAGA chaos in Congress these past two years. By putting people over politics, I’ve delivered results – the $400M Golden Gate Bridge seismic retrofit, crucial funding for water supply improvements, zero-emission busses and charging infrastructure, public housing improvements, veterans housing, bike and pedestrian pathways, kelp forest restoration and more.
          I helped pass the first prescription drug pricing reform in decades, allowing Medicare to negotiate drug price discounts, capping insulin costs for seniors at $35/month, and starting next year, capping seniors’ drug costs at $2,000/year.
          I spearheaded laws to modernize America’s infrastructure – improving roads and bridges, connecting underserved communities with high-speed broadband, modernizing the electrical grid, expanding renewable energy and building a national EV charging network.
          We’re finally taking bold action on the climate crisis and I’m leading the charge to do much more.
          I work across the aisle whenever possible, as with my bipartisan initiative that raised IDEA special education funding by $2.5 billion, and my rural hospital bill.
          But when democracy and the rule of law are threatened, I fight back. MAGA members of Congress were complicit in Donald Trump’s shameful January 6th insurrection and continue to push a dark authoritarian agenda. I am determined to defeat these threats.
          I’ll continue opposing partisan attempts to restrict abortion rights, rescind civil rights, and slash Social Security and Medicare.
          As a senior member of committees on Natural Resources and Transportation and Infrastructure, I promise to keep delivering results.
          I would be honored by your vote.

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Representante de los EE.UU.

          Educación y cualificaciones: Estoy logrando hacer las cosas pese al caos causado por los Republicanos de MAGA en el Congreso estos dos últimos años. Al poner a las personas por encima de la política, he obtenido resultados: la rehabilitación sísmica del puente Golden Gate por valor de $400 millones, el financiamiento crucial para mejoras en el suministro de agua, autobuses de cero emisiones e infraestructura de recarga, mejoras en viviendas públicas, viviendas para veteranos de guerra, senderos para bicicletas y peatones, restauración de bosques de algas marinas y mucho más.
          Ayudé a aprobar la primera reforma de precios de medicamentos que requieren receta en décadas, permitiendo a Medicare negociar descuentos en los precios de los medicamentos, limitando los costos de la insulina para los adultos mayores a $35 al mes y, a partir del próximo año, limitando los costos de los medicamentos para los adultos mayores a $2,000 al año.
          Impulsé leyes para modernizar la infraestructura de los Estados Unidos: mejora de carreteras y puentes, conexión de comunidades desatendidas con banda ancha de alta velocidad, modernización de la red eléctrica, expansión de las energías renovables y construcción de una red nacional de recarga de vehículos eléctricos.
          Finalmente estamos tomando medidas audaces para combatir la crisis climática y yo estoy liderando la lucha para hacer mucho más.
          Colaboro con la oposición siempre que puedo, como ocurre con mi iniciativa bipartidista que aumentó los fondos de educación especial de IDEA en $2.5 mil millones y mi ley para hospitales rurales.
          Sin embargo, cuando la democracia y la ley se ven amenazadas, doy pelea. Los miembros del Congreso de MAGA fueron cómplices de la vergonzosa insurrección del 6 de enero de Donald Trump y continúan promoviendo una oscura agenda autoritaria. Estoy decidido a eliminar estas amenazas.
          Seguiré oponiéndome a los intentos partidistas del GOP para restringir el derecho al aborto, rescindir los derechos civiles y recortar drásticamente Social Security y Medicare.
          En mi calidad de miembro principal de los comités de Recursos Naturales y de Transporte e Infraestructura, prometo seguir obteniendo resultados.
          Para mí será un honor contar con su voto.

      • CHRIS COULOMBE
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 42

          Occupation: Small Business Owner

          Education and Qualifications: Born and raised in Sonoma County, after earning my Eagle Scout, I enlisted in the military at 18 and returned home as an infantry captain 16-years later. I received my Bachelor’s in Politics from the University of San Francisco and Master’s in Diplomacy from Norwich University.
          With 22-years of military, business, and government policy experience to represent our 2nd District, with your help, we can protect not only the environment but small businesses and therefore improve our children’s future.
          We clearly cannot continue down our current political path. We can and must choose a better future.
          It is no longer about party lines. It is about addressing our reality and our future as a country instead of seeking partisan gain. It is about protecting our access to water and food.
          Partisan politics is destroying our environment, our economy, and our children’s future. This is our country; it is time for all of us to stand.
          We need clear-eyed leaders with well-rounded experience and vision ready to address those challenges and stay focused on the big picture… focused on moving America forward.
          Together, we can lead that change.
          I ask for your vote to serve our country once again.
          ChrisToCongress.com

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Edad: 42

          Ocupación: Propietario de un negocio pequeño

          Educación y cualificaciones: Nacido y criado en el Condado de Sonoma, después de obtener mi clasificación de Eagle Scout, me alisté en el ejército a los 18 años y regresé a casa como capitán de infantería 16 años más tarde. Obtuve mi licenciatura en Política en la Universidad de San Francisco y mi maestría en Diplomacia en la Universidad de Norwich.
          Con mis 22 años de experiencia militar, empresarial y gubernamental para representar a nuestro 2° Distrito, y su ayuda, podemos proteger no sólo el medio ambiente, sino también los negocios pequeños y, por lo tanto, mejorar el futuro de nuestros hijos.
          Está claro que no podemos continuar por el camino político actual. Podemos y debemos elegir un futuro mejor.
          Ya no se trata de lealtad a un partido. Sino que se trata de aceptar nuestra realidad y nuestro futuro como país, en lugar de buscar que gane un partido u otro. Se trata de proteger nuestro acceso a agua y alimentos.
          La política partidista está destruyendo nuestro medio ambiente, nuestra economía y el futuro de nuestros hijos. Este es nuestro país; es hora de poner manos a la obra.
          Necesitamos líderes lúcidos con experiencia y visión integrales, listos para enfrentarse a esos desafíos y mantenerse enfocados en el panorama general... enfocados en hacer avanzar a los Estados Unidos.
          Juntos podemos ser líderes de ese cambio.
          Le pido que me dé su voto para a servir a nuestro país una vez más.
          ChrisToCongress.com

    • CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY, District 12
      • DAMON CONNOLLY
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: California State Assemblymember

          Education and Qualifications: It is my privilege to serve as your State Assemblymember, ensuring that an experienced local voice represents Marin and Sonoma counties in Sacramento.
          Endorsed by the Sierra Club, California Professional Firefighters, California Teachers Association, local Labor Unions, and Planned Parenthood Northern California Action Fund, I’m a principled progressive and consensus builder who gets things done.
          In just one term in office, I’ve delivered real results, successfully getting five bills signed into law that will keep body armor out of the hands of mass shooters, ensure addictive tobacco products are not sold to teenagers, protect renters living in mobile home parks, reduce teen suicides, and cap the fees charged for residential solar projects. I also continue to build support for legislation to prevent toxic pesticide spraying along our highways.
          On top of these legislative wins, I also secured $5 million in state funding for projects throughout the North Bay for parks, firefighting equipment, affordable housing, and science education.
          I have been fighting for our communities for 18 years, including service as a Marin County Supervisor, Vice-Mayor of San Rafael, School Board President, California Deputy Attorney General and now, as your State Assemblymember and local voice in Sacramento.
          My values are North Bay values, forged by living here for more than 25 years. As your State Assemblymember, I will continue to fight for our priorities in Sacramento: wildfire prevention and home insurance, clean energy, environmental protection, protecting women’s healthcare, equal rights, and more.
          I hope to earn your vote to continue this important work together.
          https://www.damonconnolly.com

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Asambleísta del Estado de California

          Educación y cualificaciones: Es un privilegio para mí servir como asambleísta estatal, asegurando que una voz local experimentada represente a los condados de Marin y Sonoma en Sacramento.
          Respaldado por el Sierra Club, los Bomberos Profesionales de California, la Asociación de Maestros de California, los sindicatos locales y el Fondo de Acción del Norte de California de Planificación Familiar, soy un progresista de principios y un creador de consenso que sabe obtener resultados.
          En apenas un mandato, he logrado resultados reales: logré que se promulguen cinco proyectos de ley que mantendrán los chalecos antibalas fuera del alcance de los tiradores en masa, que se garantice que no se vendan productos de tabaco adictivos a los adolescentes, que se proteja a los inquilinos que viven en parques de casas móviles, que se reduzcan los suicidios de adolescentes y que se limiten los cargos que se cobran por proyectos solares residenciales. Además, sigo ganando apoyo para que se implementen leyes que eviten que se rocíen pesticidas tóxicos en los márgenes de nuestras autopistas.
          Además de estas victorias legislativas, también obtuve $5 millones en fondos estatales destinados a proyectos en todo el Norte de la Bahía para parques, equipos contra incendios, viviendas de precio accesible y educación en ciencias.
          Llevo 18 años luchando por nuestras comunidades, incluido el servicio como supervisor del Condado de Marin, Vicealcalde de San Rafael, Presidente de la Junta Escolar, Fiscal General adjunto de California y ahora, como su Asambleísta Estatal y voz local en Sacramento.
          Mis valores son los valores del Norte de la Bahía, forjados en los más de 25 años que llevo viviendo en ese lugar. Como su Asambleísta Estatal, continuaré luchando por nuestras prioridades en Sacramento: prevención de incendios forestales y seguros para el hogar, energía limpia, protección ambiental, protección de la atención médica de las mujeres, igualdad de derechos y más.
          Espero ganar su voto para seguir trabajando juntos.
          https://www.damonconnolly.com

      • ERYN CERVANTES
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 46

          Occupation: San Quentin Correctional Counselor II – Specialist

          Education and Qualifications: My name is Eryn Cervantes, and I am running for California State Assembly in District 12. I have worked for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for almost 25 years, and am currently a Correctional Counselor II - Specialist, at San Quentin State Prison. I’m also a recent law school graduate and lifelong advocate for public safety. I understand the challenges presented by brazen retail theft, property crimes, a growing homeless crisis, and the impact crime has on a community. The current approach falls short of extending much-needed support to our local law enforcement agencies, fostering an environment ripe for the escalation of crime.
          The time has come for us to make public safety a priority. My career path has equipped me with unique insight into the important roles within the criminal justice system, as well as the importance of accountability. Additionally, as a family member of double-homicide victims, I have a deep appreciation for the paths traveled by victims of crime.
          I am the candidate who understands about the need to strike a careful balance when approaching these aspects of criminal justice and public safety. Between the vast knowledge gained throughout my career and life experiences and my educational background in criminal justice and law, I possess the unique insight necessary to approach the current criminal justice and public safety challenges with meaningful, long-lasting solutions.
          I am committed to ensure local law enforcement are equipped with the resources and funding necessary to provide the protection and services our community so rightly deserves.

      CAMPAIGN FINANCE PLEDGE
      The following candidates for California State Assembly District 12 have pledged to abide by campaign spending limits as specified in California Government Code Sec. 85400 and may publish a 250-word statement of qualifications in this voter guide. Candidates are listed in order according to the randomized alphabet drawing conducted by Marin County on December 14, 2023.

      • Damon Connolly, DEM
      • Eryn Cervantes, REP
      • Andy Podshadley, REP
  • COUNTY OFFICES
    • COUNTY SUPERVISOR, District 4
      • FRANCIS DROUILLARD
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 67

          Occupation: Registered Professional Engineer/Bridge Designer

          Education and Qualifications: BSCE, University of Michigan, 1984
          We can make living in Marin County magnificent again by restoring the unique bucolic character of its small towns and cities while maintaining Open Space.
          We must end the public drug use and alcoholism that are drivers of homelessness and mental health problems. Our current “carrot only and no stick” approach allows grifters to siphon limited resources to house the unfortunate while preventing drug addicts, alcoholics, and those with mental health issues from getting the treatment they need. We must allow law enforcement to stop the cancer of personal and retail theft spreading into Marin County from San Francisco and the East Bay.
          We must revise zoning laws and enhance planning staff to create more housing compatible with Marin County to reverse decades of insufficient planning. Experienced planning staff must stay on residential construction projects through completion to reduce compliance costs incurred before construction begins. Big box government housing projects and unrealistic housing assessments imposed by Sacramento and ABAG must be opposed.
          As your supervisor I will work tirelessly to achieve those goals to restore Marin County to a magnificent place for all to live and thrive once again.
          Vote Francis Drouillard!
          Thank you!
          https://frank4supervisor.org/

      • DENNIS RODONI
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 71

          Occupation: Marin County Supervisor

          Education and Qualifications: Since my election in 2016, I have focused on the environment, emergency preparedness, and community housing. I have listened to your concerns and if re-elected, will continue to hold office hours throughout the district to ensure all constituents can be heard.
          Our work is continuing with fellow supervisors to create an emergency preparedness plan, with better emergency communications, effective emergency planning, efficient notifications and improved neighborhood preparedness. Workforce housing is a serious concern. The enaction of new countywide rental protections, easing the permit process, especially for accessible dwelling units, and protection of existing affordable housing continue to be priorities.
          I led the successful effort establishing the Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority, funding wildfire mitigation work, vegetation management, home hardening, and making sure that we are prepared for the next major fire threat.
          Defending Marin County’s environment, including its rich agricultural lands is a priority. I’ve continued to support affordable preschool, childcare, older adult programs, and our immigrant residents.
          I am endorsed by the Sierra Club, North Bay Labor Council, Planned Parenthood Northern California Action Fund, and Marin Professional Firefighters Local 1775. With your support, I will continue to be your advocate.

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Edad: 71

          Ocupación: Supervisor del Condado de Marin

          Educación y cualificaciones: Desde mi elección en 2016, me he concentrado en el medio ambiente, la preparación para emergencias y la vivienda de la comunidad. He escuchado sus inquietudes y, de ser reelegido, seguiré manteniendo horarios de oficina en todo el distrito para garantizar que todos los electores puedan ser escu chados.
          Seguimos trabajando con nuestros colegas supervisores para crear un plan de preparación ante emergencias, con mejores comunicaciones de emergencia, una planificación de emergencias eficaz, notificaciones eficientes y una mejor preparació n vecinal.
          La vivienda para los trabajadores es una grave preocupación. Siguen siendo prioritarias la promulgación de nuevas medidas de protección del alquiler en todo el condado, la agilización del proceso de concesión de permisos, especialmente para viviendas accesibles, y la protección de las viviendas de precio accesible existentes.
          Dirigí con éxito la creación de la Autoridad para la Prevención de Incendios Forestales de Marin, el financiamiento de los trabajos de mitigación de incendios forestales, el control de la vegetación, el reforzamiento de las viviendas y la garantía de que estamos preparados para la próxima gran amenaza de incendio.
          Defender el medio ambiente del Condado de Marin, incluidas sus ricas tierras agrícolas, es una prioridad. He seguido apoyando la educación preescolar de precio accesible, el cuidado de niños, los programas para adultos mayores y a nuestros residentes inmigrantes.
          Cuento con el respaldo del Sierra Club, el Consejo Laboral del Norte de la Bahía, el Fondo de Acción de Planificación Familiar del Norte de California y el Local 1775 de los Bomberos Profesionales de Marin. Con su apoyo, seguiré siendo su defensor.

  • MUNICIPAL OFFICES
    • CITY OF LARKSPUR Member, City Council - Short Term
      • STEPHANIE ANDRE
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 48

          Occupation: Parent / Investor

          Education and Qualifications: As a parent and Larkspur resident, I feel fortunate to live in this beautiful place and want to contribute to the continued success of Larkspur. My husband and I are raising our two children here. They have attended Neil Cummins, Hall and Redwood, played youth sports and enjoyed our city’s abundant outdoor activities. As a first-generation immigrant, I care deeply about increasing the diversity in our community and positioning our city to better meet the challenges of climate change, aging infrastructure and housing affordability.
          As a former investment banker and finance executive specializing in real estate, I have unique knowledge of residential housing issues. I bring decades of experience in strategic analysis, financial management and working on cross-disciplinary teams. I believe in collaborating with stakeholders in our community and will make informed decisions by seeking input from multiple perspectives.
          I earned a bachelor’s degree from Columbia University and a M.B.A. from UC Berkeley. I have served as Trustee and President of The Calvary Foundation, a non-profit endowment. I regularly volunteer at my children’s schools, my church, SF-Marin Food Bank and the Neighborhood Response Group for Larkspur’s Blue Rock neighborhood. I hope to gain your support for Larkspur City Council.

      • LANA SCOTT
        • Candidate statement in English

          Education and Qualifications: As a sixteen year resident of Marin, I have enjoyed the trails, abundant outdoor activities, local restaurants, unique shops and excellent access to healthcare. We are fortunate to live in a county that is a destination spot for so many. I am also aware there are important issues that need to be addressed such as rent control, traffic congestion and affordable housing. As a certified disability management specialist, I worked with people of all ethnicities and from all economic backgrounds and would like to continue doing so as a member of the Larkspur City Council.
          I look forward to serving on the Council to help Larkspur retain its small town feel while adjusting to changes in the environment and economy.

      • CLAIRE PAQUETTE
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 37

          Occupation: Director, Distribution and Logistics

          Education and Qualifications: Bachelor of Science, University of Wisconsin in Madison.
          I am a Marin native, raised in Greenbrae, and attended Bacich, Kent, and Redwood. I am a mother of two, a 5 year old boy and a 3 year old girl. We can frequently be found at any one of the Larkspur playgrounds, strolling the downtown giving in to kid requests for ice cream or doughnuts, or hiking to Dawn Falls.
          I plan to bring the perspective of a mother of young children to city council. Larkspur has such a vibrant foundation; its downtown is so lively and is such a value add to our experience as residents. The bike paths connect us to neighboring cities, provides a safe place for kids to commute to school, and pedestrians to stroll. I believe the duty of our council should be to maintain the quality of life we have built here in Larkspur while doing so in a fiscally responsible manner.
          As a member of city council I will bring forth a passion for Larkspur well being and maintenance. My door will always be open to feedback, and I look forward to representing young families.

Measure Information

Arguments in "support of" or in "opposition to" the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors.

  • Measure A – Tamalpais Union High School District

    To repair and upgrade local high schools by updating classrooms/ science labs/ classroom technology/ equipment; repairing/ replacing leaking roofs and inefficient heating/ cooling/ electrical/ plumbing systems; updating art/ music classrooms/ facilities; and repairing/ replacing outdated portable classrooms, shall Tamalpais Union High School District’s measure be adopted authorizing $517,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($36,000,000 annually) with independent oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators and all funds locally controlled?

    BONDS—YES                             BONDS—NO

    • IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL OF MEASURE A

      TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
      BOND MEASURE

      MEASURE A

      This Measure was placed on the ballot by the Board of Trustees of the Tamalpais Union High School District.

      Pursuant to Article XIIIA (1)(b)(3) of the California Constitution, if this measure is approved by 55% of the votes cast, the Tamalpais Union High School District will be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in multiple series of up to five hundred seventeen million dollars ($517,000,000) with an interest rate not to exceed the limit set by law.

      Money raised by bond sales may only be used for the purposes and projects stated in the Bond Project List set forth in Measure A. These purposes and projects include replacing and upgrading classroom buildings at Tamalpais and Redwood High Schools, repairing roofs, painting exteriors, repairing and/or replacing restrooms, upgrading technology infrastructure, as well as replacing portable classrooms. As required by law, Measure A prohibits using bond proceeds for teacher and administrator salaries or other operating expenses.

      The District estimates the average projected tax rate necessary to fund the bonds will be 3 cents per $100 of taxable value ($30 per $100,000 of assessed value) while the bonds are outstanding. This estimate is a projection, and could go up or down, depending on a number of factors including the timing and amount of bond sales, and changes in assessed property values in the District. If all the bonds are sold, the District estimates total debt service (including the principal and interest) will be approximately $1,040,000,000. If the bond issuance is authorized, it will commence in fiscal year 2024-25 and the final fiscal year in which it is anticipated that the revenue will be collected is 2052-53.

      The Measure requires annual independent financial audits and spending review by an independent citizens’ oversight committee.

      s/ BRIAN E. WASHINGTON
      County Counsel

    • TAX RATE STATEMENT

      An election will be held within the boundaries of Tamalpais Union High School District (“District”) on March 5, 2024 to authorize the sale of up to $517 million in bonds to finance facilities as described in the measure. If the bonds are approved, the District expects to sell the bonds in multiple series. Principal and interest on the bonds will be payable from the proceeds of tax levies made upon the taxable property located within the District. The following information is provided in compliance with Sections 9400 to 9404, inclusive, of the California Elections Code.

      1. The best estimate from official sources of the average annual tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund this bond issue over the entire duration of the bond debt service, based on assessed valuations available at the time of the election, a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction and other demonstrable factors, is estimated to be $30 per $100,000 (3 cents per $100) of assessed valuation. The final fiscal year in which the tax is anticipated to be collected is 2052-53.
      2. The best estimate from official sources of the highest tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund this bond issue, and an estimate of the year in which that rate will apply, based on assessed valuations available at the time of filing this statement, a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction and other demonstrable factors, is estimated to be $30 per $100,000 (3 cents per $100) of assessed valuation first occurring in fiscal year 2024-25.
      3. The best estimate from official sources of the total debt service, including the principal and interest, that would be required to be repaid if all the bonds are issued and sold is $1.04 billion.

      Voters should note that the estimated tax rate is based on the ASSESSED VALUE of taxable property on the Marin County official tax rolls, not on the property’s market value. Property owners should consult their own property tax bills to determine their property’s assessed value and any applicable tax exemptions.

      Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District. The actual tax rates, debt service and the years in which they will apply may vary from those presently estimated, due to variations from these estimates in the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold and market interest rates at the time of each sale, and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the District based on need for construction funds and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

      Dr. Tara Taupier, Superintendent

    • ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A

      Vote Yes on A to maintain high-quality education at Tam High, Redwood, Archie Williams, San Andreas, and Tamiscal high schools.

      Our local high schools consistently win state and national awards recognizing the high-quality education they provide for local students. However, classrooms, labs, facilities, and school technology were built for a different era of learning.

      Redwood and Archie Williams are both over 60 years old and Tam High is over 100 years old. The last significant upgrades to our schools occurred almost 20 years ago. Because the state does not provide funding for facilities, local schools cannot update classrooms and labs to support quality education without local funding.

      Voting Yes on A means our local high schools can continue to prepare students for college and careers and ensures local students have the same state-of-the-art educational facilities as other high school students in Marin County already have.

      Yes on A will:

      • Repair and replace leaking roofs and inefficient heating, cooling, electrical, and plumbing systems
      • Rebuild and update math, art, and music classrooms and science labs
      • Repair, replace, and upgrade disability access and security, fire, lighting, and other safety systems

      Strict Accountability Keeps Measure A Local

      • All Measure A funds are locally controlled and cannot be taken by the State
      • Citizens’ oversight and annual audits ensure all funds are spent as promised
      • No funds can be spent on administrators’ salaries

      Whether or not you have school-age children, supporting quality education is a wise investment. Good schools improve the quality of life in our community and protect the value of our homes. Additionally, the new facilities will be available to every member of the community for after-school use.

      Join local parents, teachers, business, and community leaders – vote Yes on A to maintain the high quality of education local students deserve!

      LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MARIN COUNTY
      Kevin M. Hagerty, President

      JOHN A. CARROLL
      Marin County Superintendent of Schools & San Geronimo resident

      STEPHANIE MOULTON-PETERS
      Marin County Supervisor, District 3

      FELECIA GASTON
      Performing Stars Executive Director & 30-year Marin City resident

      CHUCK FORD
      Former TUHSD Trustee & 50-year West Marin resident

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A

      VOTE NO ON MEASURE A.

      MEASURE A DESERVES AN F. While raising $1.04 billion of new taxes, it Fails to prioritize improving student outcomes, closing the achievement gap, or addressing inequities.

      Measure A Fails Students and Young Families.

      • This unnecessary tax makes it even harder for hardworking families to move into the District or stay here. TUHSD’s own forecast of a 29% enrollment DROP (fy2022-2030) reflects this worsening reality.

      Measure A Fails the Fairness test.

      • Like Redwood High School, Archie Williams High School is over 60 years old. But Redwood gets an expensive new cafeteria and 4x as much money.

      Measure A Fails to Tell Voters the TRUTH.

      • Redwood’s proposed $106 million cafeteria is the tax measure’s most expensive project. The Argument in Favor of Measure A doesn’t even mention it.
      • Measure A is “one of the largest” Marin school taxes ever per The Marin Independent Journal. The Argument in Favor fails to disclose the $1.04 billion total cost to property owners.
      • Property values can’t benefit from Measure A. It makes homes even more unaffordable.

      Measure A Fails the Math Test.

      • Cost estimates for Redwood’s cafeteria and Tam’s classroom building more than doubled in 2023. How will they fund the rest of the extensive project list?

      Measure A Fails our Community.

      • Landlords will raise already sky-high rents to pay for the tax.
      • Employers and jobs continue to exit Marin.

      Measure A Fails to Prioritize Students’ Most Urgent Needs.

      • More funding should go into the classroom instead of buildings. Overcrowded classes and low-income students’ achievement gap must be addressed.

      Let’s invest in students, not new buildings!

      VOTE NO ON MEASURE A.

      LUCY DILWORTH
      Former Marin County Grand Jury Foreperson

      SUSAN KIRCH
      Community organizer & educator & 42-year Mill Valley resident

      KARL SPURZEM
      Corte Madera Finance & Audit Committee, Sales Tax Oversight Committee

      PASCAL SISICH
      Former San Anselmo Planning Commission, Library Tax Oversight & Capital Program Monitoring Committees

    • ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE A

      Vote NO On Measure A

      It is a $1.04 BILLION tax that increases inequality and does not deliver what our students need most.

      Measure A’s biggest expenditure is an unnecessary, non-essential, gold-plated cafeteria. No money goes to reduce overcrowded classrooms, close the huge educational achievement gap for low-income students, or attract and retain top teachers.

      Marin values diversity, economic justice, fairness, and community engagement. Here is how Measure A falls short of these fundamental principles:

      • The Gold-Plated Cafeteria: Tamalpais Union High School District rates the proposed $106 million cafeteria at Redwood High School nonessential. Considering steep enrollment declines and students’ preference for lunch off-campus, the “bill” for this five-star venue is excessive.
      • Lacks Transparency: Tamalpais Union High School District asks voters to approve a $517 million bond. Their ballot question doesn’t tell you that with interest payments the TRUE cost to voters is $1.04 Billion; nor does it state the tax increases every year for 30 years.
      • Inequitable: Archie Williams High School receives less than 15% of the bond revenues and will not benefit from any major project. AWHS area households have a lower median income than the rest of TUHSD. AWHS residents’ taxes will subsidize projects for Redwood and Tamalpais High Schools.
      • Unfair: Those least able to afford an increase in property taxes are obligated to pay. There are no exemptions or discounts for low income homeowners, seniors, or disabled. Measure A does nothing to prevent landlords from passing on the tax’s costs to renters.
      • Misguided: Millions of dollars already spent on architects and political consultants should have gone into classrooms instead of an unapproved bond measure.

      We value education and want our students to thrive. Our community IS willing to spend money that directly improves the education of ALL our students. Measure A does NOT do this.

      We should not pay for a gold-plated cafeteria, more unfairness, and more inequality.

      Please Vote NO on Measure A.

      JULIA VIOLICH
      TUHSD Mountain Bike Coach & Marin County Bicycle Coalition Director

      MATTHEW BROWN
      Former San Anselmo Mayor

      JAMES H. ANDREWS
      Former Corte Madera Councilmember & Mayor

      RICHARD SHORTALL
      Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection District President

      DOUG KELLY
      Ross Valley Sanitary District Director & Former San Anselmo Councilmember

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE A

      The opponents’ argument is misleading and ignores important FACTS:

      FACT: Aging high schools need urgent repairs. Classrooms and labs have leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, outdated electrical systems and poor access for students with disabilities. Upgrades will protect student safety, support teachers and enhance quality academics. Waiting only makes upgrades more expensive.

      FACT: Measure A results from a transparent, community-driven process. For two years Tamalpais Union High School District meticulously evaluated each of its five schools and conducted 39 community meetings to collect priorities from teachers, parents and the community. Measure A reflects community priorities and requires strict fiscal accountability. By law funds from this type of measure can only be used for facility improvements.

      FACT: Describing Measure A as a “$1.04 billion tax” is an unfair characterization intended to mislead. Like all school bonds, the cost of Measure A is limited by state law and will cost the same as other recent Marin school bonds, including San Rafael’s 2022 high school bond. Exemptions are not legally allowed for bonds, but longtime residents pay the least.

      FACT: Measure A is fair and equitable. Measure A focuses on the oldest facilities with the most urgent needs. What’s more equitable than putting resources where they are needed most?

      FACT: What they mischaracterize as a “cafeteria” is much more. This facility replaces three of the most dilapidated buildings at Redwood High and provides food preparation, classrooms and space for student services and collaboration.

      Teachers, parents and trusted elected leaders support Measure A because upgrading aging high schools is essential for quality education and student safety.

      JARED HUFFMAN
      U. S. Congressman

      MARY JANE BURKE
      Marin County Superintendent of Schools Emeritus

      PAUL AUSTIN
      Founder of Play Marin Youth Recreation & lifelong Marin City resident

      STEPHANIE HELLMAN
      Fairfax Town Councilmember & Archie Williams High School parent

      JED SMITH
      Entrepreneur & Tam Union High School parent

    • FULL TEXT OF MEASURE A

      TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
      BOND MEASURE

      By approval of this measure by at least fifty-five percent (55%) of the registered voters voting thereon, the Tamalpais Union High School District (“District”) shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $517,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed below in the Bond Project List, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified herein.

      SECTION I: KEY FINDINGS

      • Tam High, Redwood, Archie Williams, San Andreas and Tamiscal High Schools consistently rank among the best high schools in the state and the nation.
      • The approximately 5,000 students in the District perform well above state and national averages.
      • Many District graduates are accepted into top colleges and universities around the country.
      • However, with Tam High over 100 years old and Redwood and Archie Williams over 60 years old, District high schools are aging and in need of repair.
      • To identify facility needs at each District school site and to prioritize improvements based on urgency and importance, the District performed a thorough assessment of all facilities by architects and school construction experts.
      • Along with this assessment, District staff collected and analyzed feedback from more than 775 school and community stakeholders.
      • Taken together, this outreach formed the basis of the District’s Facilities Master Plan, drafted during the Spring of 2022.
      • Additional funds are needed to begin addressing the most urgent needs identified in the Facilities Master Plan, such as:
        • Repair and replacement of aging and leaking roofs;
        • Repair and replacement of outdated and inefficient heating, cooling, electrical and plumbing systems;
        • Improvements to classroom, science lab, technology and infrastructure at all District campuses;
        • Updates to technology and equipment for classrooms, science and computer labs;
        • Updates to career and job training classrooms for current educational standards;
        • Updates to art, music and performing arts classrooms; and
        • Replacement of outdated, aging and deteriorating temporary portable classrooms;
      • The state does not provide funding for facility improvements, so local schools cannot maintain modern facilities, infrastructure and technology without a local funding source.
      • The Board of Trustees believes that locally controlled funding from a school facilities improvement bond measure are needed to fund identified upgrades and repairs at local high schools.
      • Proceeds from a voter-approved school facilities improvement bond measure would be controlled locally for District high schools only and could not be taken away by the State.
      • None of the money raised would be used for administrators’ salaries or pensions or other school operating expenses.
      • An independent citizens’ oversight committee, mandatory annual audits and public disclosure of all spending will help ensure funds are spent as intended.

      An independent citizens’ oversight committee, mandatory annual audits and public disclosure of all spending will help ensure funds are spent as intended.

      SECTION II: ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES

      The provisions in this section are included in this proposition in order that the voters and taxpayers of the District may be assured that their money will be spent to address specific facilities needs of the District, all in compliance with the requirements of Article XIII A, section 1(b)(3) of the State Constitution, and the Strict Accountability in Local School Construction Bonds Act of 2000 (codified at Section 15264 et seq. of the California Education Code).

      Evaluation of Needs. The Board of Trustees has evaluated the facilities needs of the District and has identified projects to finance from a local bond measure at this time. The Board of Trustees has certified that it has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs in developing the Bond Project List.

      Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee. The Board of Trustees shall establish an independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee in accordance with Education Code sections 15278-15282 and applicable Board policy, to ensure bond proceeds are expended only for the school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List. The committee shall be established within sixty (60) days of the date when the Board of Education enters the results of the election in its official minutes.

      Annual Performance Audit. The Board of Trustees shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the bond proceeds have been expended only on the school facilities projects described in the Bond Project List.

      Annual Financial Audit. The Board of Trustees shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual, independent financial audit of the bond proceeds until all of those proceeds have been spent.

      Annual Report to Board. Upon approval of this measure and the sale of any bonds approved, the Board of Trustees shall take actions necessary to establish an account in which proceeds of the sale of bonds will be deposited. As long as any proceeds of the bonds remain unexpended, the Superintendent shall cause a report to be filed with the Board of Trustees no later than January 1 of each year, commencing on the first January 1 after bonds have been issued and proceeds spent, stating (1) the amount of bond proceeds received and expended in the past fiscal year, and (2) the status of any project funded or to be funded from bond proceeds. The report may be incorporated into the annual budget, annual financial report, or other appropriate routine report to the Board.

      SECTION III: BOND PROJECT LIST

      This Bond Project List, which is an integral part of this proposition, describes the specific projects the District proposes to finance with proceeds of the bonds. All information contained within this “Section III: Bond Project List” comprises the list and description of permissible projects and expenses that may be paid from bond proceeds.

      In order to meet all identified facility needs, the District intends to complete projects using a combination of funding sources, including joint use funds or contributions, development impact fees, and state funding (if available). The District will pursue state matching funds if and when they become available, and if received, they will be used for projects on the Bond Project List or other high priority capital outlay expenditures as permitted by law. Approval of this measure does not guarantee that all projects on this Bond Project List at all listed sites will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by this measure. The District’s proposal for the projects assumes the receipt of some state matching funds, which could be subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a statewide bond measure. Bond funds may be used to meet any matching share contribution requirements.

      Proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by this measure shall be used only for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, replacement, furnishing and equipping of school facilities on the Bond Project List. Projects listed below may be completed at any and all properties, school sites and facilities where such project is determined necessary, and projects are authorized to be performed at each and all of the District’s high schools and the adult school, and administrative and ancillary support facilities, whether owned, leased or yet to be acquired, including, without limitation, the following school sites and properties:

      • Archie Williams High School
      • Redwood High School
      • San Andreas High School
      • Tamalpais High School
      • Tamiscal High School

      Specific projects to be funded by the bond measure include the following:

      A. COMPLETE BASIC REPAIRS, RENOVATIONS AND SYSTEM UPGRADES

      • Replace and upgrade outdated classroom buildings at Tamalpais and Redwood High Schools;
      • Replace and/or upgrade outdated portable buildings on school campuses, including, without limitation, at replacement of portable buildings at Tamiscal High School with new modular buildings; remove unused, outdated portable buildings from school campuses;
      • Replace deteriorating and leaky roofs;;
      • Repaint school exteriors and interiors and refresh or replace trees and landscaping;
      • Repair and replace aging student restrooms, including gender neutral toilet modernization, reconfiguration, and additions;
      • Improve technology infrastructure to increase bandwidth Districtwide and enhance network-based content and curriculum delivery; provide updated classroom audio/visual technology for content delivery and presentation (which may include projectors and/or large format flat-screen monitors and sound and voice amplification systems); Acquire and/or improve classroom technology, upgrade backbone systems wireless access points, switches, and MDF/IDF data rooms with environmental controls.

      B. PROVIDE STUDENT HEALTH/SAFETY UPGRADES AND ENERGY/RESOURCE EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS

      • Repair/replace leaking water and irrigation lines and valves to improve water efficiency;
      • Modernize plumbing, heating and cooling systems to reduce carbon footprint, conserve water, reduce wastewater and improve student learning environments;
      • Repair/replace outdated electrical switchgear to improve resilience and safety;
      • Repair/modernize fire and life safety systems including alarms, elevators and fire exits;
      • Upgrade restrooms and path of travel to improve access for students with disabilities and meet current Americans with Disabilities Act requirements;
      • Improve security at schools by providing wayfinding, signage, fire and classroom intrusion alarms, public address and emergency communication systems, safety locks on classroom doors, campus access control systems and exterior lighting for student safety;
      • Provide solar photovoltaic parking structures and electric vehicle charging stations to offset energy usage, reduce carbon footprint and promote sustainable practices;
      • Provide solar water heaters to reduce energy consumption and improve sustainability;
      • Expand/reconfigure student services spaces to enhance student wellness;
      • Improve vehicle and bicycle parking lots and drop-off areas to enhance student safety and improve traffic circulation; resurface asphalt parking areas;
      • Expand storage for emergency supplies;
      • Upgrade theatrical lighting to LED to improve efficiency and reduce heat load.

      C. RENOVATE, UPGRADE AND IMPROVE CLASSROOMS, LABS, LEARNING SPACES AND TECHNOLOGY

      • Construct, furnish and equip flexible classrooms, learning studios, innovation centers, performance spaces, collaboration spaces, and maker spaces for STEAM, art, robotics, auto shop, technology, computer lab, broadcast media, music, and drama at all comprehensive high schools;
      • Provide additional shade structures to offer outdoor learning, gathering, and dining spaces;
      • Upgrade, remodel, expand, repurpose, install, construct, modernize, reconfigure, or relocate food service facilities and dining spaces, including related equipment and/or appliances.
      • Modernize physical education classrooms, weight rooms, and storage; refurbish swimming pools and add cogeneration systems to improve safety and energy efficiency; replace grass fields and existing synthetic turf fields with all-weather synthetic turf to improve water efficiency, control run-off and extend playable hours; improve track and athletic facilities; add, resurface, and/or restripe hardcourts; add or repair existing playfields;
      • Construct and/or improve, furnish and equip performing arts and music spaces and venues;
      • Expand and modernize career-technical education classrooms, labs and equipment to prepare students for careers in fields like health science, engineering, technology and skilled trades;
      • Construct and/or expand and upgrade buildings and rooms to support student health and wellness services and programs;
      • Furnish and equip all classrooms and learning spaces.

      Listed projects, repairs, improvements, rehabilitation projects and upgrades will be completed only as needed, and the listing of projects does not imply a particular prioritization among such improvements. Projects may be done in phases, based on Board of Trustees priorities available funding. Listed projects may be completed at any and all District schools, sites, properties (owned, leased or yet to be acquired) and education buildings where such project is determined necessary. Decisions regarding the scope, timing, prioritization or other facets of project implementation will be made solely by the Board of Trustees by subsequent action. Where terms such as “renovate,” “upgrade,” “replace” and “improve” are used in the Bond Project List, the Board of Trustees has the discretion to determine the best method for accomplishing the project’s objective, including the use of new construction. For any listed project involving renovation or modernization of a building or the major portion of a building, the District may proceed with new replacement construction instead (including any necessary demolition), if the District determines that replacement and new construction is more practical than renovation, considering the building’s age, condition, expected remaining life, comparative cost and other relevant factors. In addition, where feasible, projects may be completed in partnership with other public or private agencies on a joint use basis using bond proceeds, subject to federal tax rules and regulations.

      Each project is assumed to include its share of costs of bond issuance, architectural, engineering, legal and similar planning costs; litigation costs; construction management; bond project consultants; staff development and training expenses associated with learning construction techniques and approaches and new bond-funded equipment and systems; the furnishing and equipping of all projects, including equipment to maintain facilities in a safe and clean condition; and a customary contingency for unforeseen design and construction costs. Payment of the costs of preparation of facilities planning and project implementation studies, feasibility and assessment reviews, master planning, environmental studies, permit and inspection fees, Division of State Architect (DSA) - related requirements, studies and assessments, including ADA and seismic, and temporary housing and relocation costs for dislocated programs or activities caused or necessitated by projects on the Bond Project List are permissible bond expenditures.

      The final cost of each project will be determined as plans are finalized and projects are completed. Based on the final costs of each project, certain of the projects described above may be delayed or may not be completed. Necessary site preparation, grading or restoration may occur in connection with acquisition of property, new construction, modernization, renovation or remodeling, or installation or removal of modular classrooms, including ingress and egress, removing, replacing or installing irrigation, utility lines, trees and landscaping, relocating fire access roads and acquiring any necessary easements, leases, licenses or rights of way to the property.

      SECTION IV: ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

      No Operating Expenses. Proceeds from the sale of Bonds authorized by this proposition shall be used only for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities on the Bond Project List, including the furnishing and equipping of said school facilities, or the acquisition or lease of real property for said school facilities, and not for any other purpose, including teacher or administrator salaries and other school operating expenses in accordance with applicable law.

      Single Purpose. All of the purposes enumerated in this proposition shall be united and voted upon as one single proposition, pursuant to Section 15100 of the California Education Code, and all the enumerated purposes shall constitute the specific single purpose of the bonds and proceeds of the bonds shall be spent only for such purpose.

      Other Terms of the Bonds. The bonds may be issued and sold in several series, and in accordance with a financing plan determined by the Board of Education pursuant to requirements of law. When sold, the bonds shall bear interest at an annual rate not exceeding the statutory maximum and with a maximum term not exceeding the statutory maximum, provided that the average useful life of bonds sold will not exceed one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the average life of the projects being financed or as otherwise provided by federal tax law. Bond funds may be used to reimburse the District for Bond Project list expenditures incurred prior to the election and bond issuance, in accordance with federal tax law.

      Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the financial information contained in this measure is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District, nor are the summary or average payment estimates, if any, provided in the Ballot Label. The actual tax rates, debt service and the years in which they will apply may vary from those presently estimated, due to variations from these estimates in the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold and market interest rates at the time of each sale, and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the District based on need for construction funds and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

      In preparing this information, the District obtained reasonable and informed projections of assessed property valuations that took into consideration projections of assessed property valuations made by the County Assessor, if any, in accordance with Education Code Section 15100(c).

  • Measure D – City of Larkspur

    Referendum of Ordinance Regarding Rent Stabilization. Shall Ordinance No. 1067, establishing a prohibition on residential real property rental rate increases that exceed five percent plus Consumer Price Index or seven percent, whichever is lower, in a twelvemonth period annually, and defining a base rent as the rent in effect on May 8, 2023, be adopted?

    YES                             NO

    • IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY OF MEASURE D

      CITY OF LARKSPUR

      MEASURE D

      This measure was placed on the ballot by a referendum petition signed by the legally required number of City of Larkspur voters. It asks whether to enact into law an Ordinance adopted by the Larkspur City Council that would establish limits on annual rent increases for some residential real property.

      On September 6, 2023, the Larkspur City Council enacted Ordinance No. 1067 (the “Ordinance”). For some residential real property, the Ordinance would prohibit annual rent increases that exceed five percent plus a consumer price index or seven percent, whichever is lower. It would establish a base rent for residential real property covered by the Ordinance, which would serve as the reference point from which the lawful rent would be determined and adjusted. For rentals that commenced before May 8, 2023, the base rent would be the rent that was in effect on May 8, 2023. For rentals that commence on or after May 8, 2023, the base rent would be the initial rental rate.

      The Ordinance would establish procedures under which an owner of residential real property may petition the City for a rent increase in excess of that authorized, in order to obtain a fair and reasonable return on their property. The City Manager would consider factors and information listed in the Ordinance and decide whether to allow for an additional rent increase based on a fair return petition. The City Council would appoint a five-member board to hear appeals of City Manager decisions.

      The Ordinance would not apply to residential real property that received a certificate of occupancy after February 1, 1995, or that is exempt from rent regulations under a state law known as Tenant Protection Act of 2019. Other examples of exempt residential real property include but are not limited to permitted accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, as well as owner-occupied property when the property is the owner’s principal place of residence during the tenancy

      Property owners subject to the Ordinance would be required to pay a program fee annually as established by City Council resolution to fund the costs of administration. An owner who violates the Ordinance would be liable in a civil action to the tenant from whom unlawful payment is demanded, accepted or retained.

      A “YES” vote is a vote in favor of enacting the prohibition on rental rate increases for non-exempt residential real property that exceed five percent plus consumer price index or seven percent, whichever is lower, in a twelve-month period annually, and other regulations described above. A “NO” vote is a vote against the restrictions on rental rate increases for some residential real property.

      Measure D would be approved with a simple majority of “YES” votes.

      The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure D. If you desire a copy of the Ordinance, please call the City Clerk at 415-927-5002 or email cityclerk@cityoflarkspur.org and a copy will be sent at no cost to you.

      Date: December 18, 2023

      s/ Sky Woodruff
      City Attorney
      City of Larkspur

    • ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE D

      The skyrocketing cost of housing in Larkspur is costing all of us. We have to find a better way to keep renters housed while keeping landlords in business. Rapidly increasing rents are crimping the household budgets and displacing too many fixed income seniors, too many young families and too many essential workers like teachers and first responders.

      While we build more housing in the next decade, let us support common-sense rent control measures that improve already existing California state rent control. All Californians are protected by state rent control law AB 1482 but COVID demonstrated the lack of protection from hyper-inflation spikes. The ordinance takes existing state law and lowers the 10% state cap to 7%, reducing renter displacement while giving landlords room to maintain their assets and keep up with inflation. A rental registry would collect data needed to better guide policy. The mechanism for appealing the 7% cap minimizes cost and bureaucratic red tape. The ordinance sunsets in 2029 because demographics and housing needs are expected to change.

      Larkspur’s ordinance was written after holding one year of community workshops and public hearings with small and large landlords, renters and homeowners. Larkspur also passed a balanced, common sense just-cause ordinance to protect seniors and vulnerable tenants for no-fault evictions. Staff has been responsive to the concerns of both landlords and tenants. Please vote yes on Measure D.

      s/ GABE PAULSON
      Larkspur Councilmember

      s/ KEVIN CARROLL
      Larkspur Councilmember

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE D

      Housing costs have risen in Larkspur, but Measure D won’t provide the relief proponents suggest. The fact is, Measure D won’t lower rental prices or create a single new unit of affordable housing. Though many won’t benefit, all will be affected by helping foot the bill for a whole new bureaucracy and unfunded liability at City Hall.

      Over five years, the city’s own “rough estimate” of the costs to implement and enforce Measure D could total millions of dollars, with the most expensive component of this new bureaucracy containing a “recoverable amount uncertain.” If some of these six-figure annual costs remain unrecoverable, the only person left to pick up the tab is you: Larkspur taxpayers.

      Proponents of Measure D point to a year of workshops and hearings leading up to the passage of their ordinance. Despite talking about stabilizing rents for an entire year, they concede: Measure D allows up to 7% annual rental increases for those living in apartments built before 1995, with even higher annual rental increases allowed in newer apartments and certain other types of rental units. To make matters worse, the public has never seen a full fiscal analysis on Measure D to understand its true costs.

      If you’re a renter, read the fine print, because many won’t benefit and even if you think you will, Measure D still allows landlords to increase rental prices up to 7% annually – not including what could be a multi-million-dollar price tag to oversee Measure D at City Hall.

      Vote No on Measure D.

      www.NoOnMeasureD.com

      BILL HOWARD
      Former Mayor, City of Larkspur

      GLORIA AQUILINO
      Small Business Owner in Larkspur

    • ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE D

      Affordable housing is a legitimate issue in Larkspur, but Measure D is the wrong solution. It will be costly for taxpayers, have unintended consequences that could reduce funding for other essential services, and won’t provide any new affordable housing options for Larkspur’s seniors and working families.

      Measure D will create a whole new bureaucracy at City Hall, including substantial staff time to oversee, administer and enforce Measure D, likely at a significant cost to taxpayers – to make matters worse, city leaders failed to consider the full fiscal impact of Measure D before passing the ordinance.

      Measure D won’t lower rents, create more affordable housing, or address homelessness. In fact, much of Larkspur’s housing stock won’t be covered by Measure D. Renters in single-family homes, condominiums and any apartments built after 1995 will generally not be covered by Measure D.

      California’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office stated that policies like Measure D “does very little to address the underlying cause of California’s high housing costs: a housing shortage.” Their independent report shows how rent control is not effective at creating affordable housing.

      Instead, Measure D could reduce the amount of affordable housing in Larkspur by reducing turnover and when a rent-controlled unit does become available, creating a situation where prospective tenants with higher incomes and credit scores are sought for those units instead of those who really need it.

      Voting No on Measure D is a vote to maintain fair housing policies in Larkspur instead of creating an uneven playing field to benefit those living in apartments built before 1995. That’s why we, as Larkspur residents, homeowners, and small business owners, have come together to oppose Measure D.

      Read the fine print and don’t be fooled – the fact is, Measure D won’t address our lack of affordable housing, but it will cost taxpayers.

      Vote No on Measure D.

      www.NoOnMeasureD.com

      BILL HOWARD
      Former Mayor, City of Larkspur

      DENNIS A. GILARDI
      4th Generation Larkspur Resident

      GLORIA AQUILINO
      Small Business Owner in Larkspur

      JEROME BERNAL
      Larkspur Business Owner

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE D

      The argument against Measure D misrepresents two key points.

      First, the common-sense reduction in the rental cap is not meant to create affordable housing. That is not job of the city or tenants. That is the job of the State, County, landlords and developers.

      Measure D is meant to preserve the 1800-2000 units where the ordinance will apply. Rents will always increase and immediately allowed to increase to market rent upon vacancy. Measure D is intended to protect the hundreds of constituents, especially fixed-income seniors and service workers who addressed the City Council about not being able to afford 10% a year rent increases. A 7% increase merely requires landlords to spread their increases over 3 years instead of 2 years to allow more vulnerable renters to adjust to changes. A sunset clause in 2029 allows the council to evaluate its effectiveness.

      Second, the administrative costs and staffing will be born by landlords and tenants, not taxpayers. The fees will be used for a rental registry needed to guide policy and create the most level playing field. The one issue landlords and tenants agreed on in the beginning of this process was the lack of hard data on which to base decisions that affect 48% of our community. The information gathered will be vital to make fact based decisions on Zoning, the General Plan, and how we respond to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment. Help us plan for the future of Larkspur. Please vote yes.

      s/ KEVIN CARROLL
      Larkspur Councilmember

    • FULL TEXT OF MEASURE D

      CITY OF LARKSPUR
      ORDINANCE 1067

      AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LARKSPUR

      AMENDING THE LARKSPUR MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 6.20, ESTABLISHING RENT STABILIZATION REGULATIONS INCLUDING PROHIBITING RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY RENTAL RATE INCREASES THAT EXCEED FIVE PERCENT PLUS A CONSUMER PRICE INDEX OR SEVEN PERCENT, WHICHEVER IS LOWER, IN A TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ANNUALLY, AND DEFINING A BASE RENT AS THE RENT IN EFFECT ON MAY 8, 2023

      WHEREAS,beginning in the summer of 2022, the City Council began to explore the concepts of rent stabilization and eviction protections. At its meeting on March 15, 2023, the City Council decided to transition from exploring these topics to specific terms and regulations. The City Council held public hearings on May 8, 2023, and May 22, 2023, at which Council discussed specific proposals to address rent increases on residential real property and displacement. Throughout the workshops and public hearings, the City Council heard testimony from tenants and property owners regarding the scope of rent increases and resident displacement, both as a result of rent increases and aspects of eviction protections in State law;

      WHEREAS,the housing shortage and rising costs of living in Marin County has detrimentally impacted a substantial number of residents in Larkspur;

      WHEREAS,the housing shortage, rise in cost of living expenses including rent, and displacement of residents constitutes a threat to public health, safety and welfare, and imposes a particular hardship on senior citizens, persons living on fixed incomes, and other vulnerable persons living in the City of Larkspur (“City”);

      WHEREAS,the average household in the City has a median annual income of $135,260, slightly above the Marin median annual income of $131,008, and well-above the California median annual income of $84,087;

      WHEREAS,Marin County Assessor Data shows that the median home price in the City in 2022 was $2.4 million for a single-family home and $805,000 for a condominium, which are prices that are extremely difficult for households at or below the median income to finance;

      WHEREAS, the average monthly rents in the City range from $2,436 for a studio apartment to $4,721 for a three bedroom apartment, and the median gross rent in Larkspur over the five years ending in 2021 was $2,610;

      WHEREAS, U.S. Census Bureau data shows that 23.0% of renters in the City spend 30-50% of their income on housing and 26.3% of renters spend 50% or more of their income on housing and are considered “severely cost burdened”;

      WHEREAS, the cost burden rate in the City is sufficiently high to create anxiety about rent increases as the increasing housing rent burden and poverty faced by many residents in the City threatens the health, safety, and welfare of its residents by forcing them to choose between paying rent and providing food, clothing, and medical care for themselves and their families;

      WHEREAS, the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 is a statewide law that limits annual rent increases to no more than five percent (5%) plus local Consumer Price Index, or ten percent (10%), whichever is lower, is not applicable to units that are more than fifteen (15) years old on a rolling basis, applies to single family homes and condominiums if those units are owned by a real estate trust or a corporation, and is set to sunset on January 1, 2030;

      WHEREAS, the recent and ongoing spike in the inflation rate has resulted in permissible rent increases of up to 10% under the Tenant Protection Act, which caused some residents to relocate or become fearful of needing to relocate for financial reasons;

      WHEREAS, this fear of displacement has been determined to be a threat to the City’s health and well-being;

      WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the City, owners, residents, and the community as a whole that the City adopt rent stabilizations regulations that establish a ceiling for how much rent may increase in a given period for residential real property in order to ensure a rental rate that tenants can still afford while still allowing for the landlord to still realize a fair rate of return;

      WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s police power, as granted broadly under Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, the City Council has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances and regulations for the public peace, health and safety of the City and its residents; and

      WHEREAS, for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, the City Council finds that it is necessary to adopt an ordinance stabilizing rents for the reasons set forth above, which are hereby incorporated by reference.

      NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LARKSPUR DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

      Section 1

      Recitals. The above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

      Section 2

      Amendment of Larkspur Municipal Code to Add Chapter 6.20. The Larkspur Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 6.20 to Title 6, which shall read as follows:

      6.20.010 Title.

      This ordinance shall be known as the Larkspur Rent Stabilization Ordinance.

      6.20.020 Purpose and Intent.
      1. It is the purpose and intent of this chapter to adopt a rent stabilization ordinance for the City that ensures affordable rental rates for tenants while still allowing for landlords to realize a fair and reasonable rate of return as defined herein.
      2. The City Council finds that the prohibitions herein are necessary for the preservation and protection of the public health, safety and/or welfare. These prohibitions are within the authority conferred upon the City Council by state law and are an exercise of its police powers to enact and enforce regulations for the public health, safety and/or welfare
      6.20.030 Definitions.

       

      1. “Base Rent” shall mean the reference point from which the lawful Rent shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with this Chapter.
        1. The Base Rent for tenancies that commenced before May 8, 2023, shall be the rent in effect on May 8, 2023.
        2. The Base Rent for tenancies that commenced on or after May 8, 2023, shall be the initial rental rate charged upon initial occupancy, provided that amount is not a violation of this Chapter or any provision of state law. The term “initial rental rate” means only the amount of Rent actually paid by the Tenant for the initial term of the tenancy.
      2. “Fair return petition” shall mean a petition made by an owner of residential real property for a rent increase in excess of that provided in Section 6.20.040 in order to obtain a fair and reasonable return on their property.
      3. “Reasonable rate of return” shall have the meaning assigned the term by California and Federal courts in precedential published opinions regarding rent stabilization ordinances for residential tenancies. Generally, within the context of a rent stabilization ordinance, the term refers to a rate of just and reasonable return on an owner’s property that is high enough to encourage and reward efficient management, discourage the flight of capital, maintain adequate services, and enable operators to maintain and support an owner’s credit status, but not so high as to defeat the purpose of curtailing excessive rents and rental increases.
      4. “Rent” shall mean all periodic payments and all nonmonetary consideration, including, but not limited to, the fair market value of goods and services rendered to or for the benefit of the owner under an agreement concerning the use or occupancy of residential real property, including, but not limited to, all payment and consideration demanded or paid for parking, pets, furniture and subletting.
      6.20.040 Stabilization of Rent and Prohibited Increases.

       

      1. Upon the effective date of this Chapter, no owner of residential real property shall charge Rent in an amount that exceeds the sum of the Base Rent plus any lawful Rent increases actually implemented pursuant to this Chapter.
      2. Increases in rent on residential real property in the City in excess of five percent (5%) plus the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward or seven percent (7%), whichever is lower, and more than one rent increase in any 12 month period, are prohibited, unless approved pursuant to a fair return petition pursuant to this Chapter or expressly exempt under the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act codified in Cal. Civil Code, Section 1954.50 et seq.
      6.20.050 Reasonable Rate of Return.

      The adjustment of residential real property rent of up to five percent (5%) plus the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward or seven percent (7%), whichever is lower, is found and determined to provide a just and reasonable return on an owner’s property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, any owner of residential real property who contends that the limit on rental increases set forth in Section 6.20.040 above will prevent the owner from receiving a fair and reasonable return on their property may petition for relief from the cap set forth in Section 6.20.040 pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 6.20.060 below.

      6.20.060 Fair Return Petition for Rent Increase.
      1. An owner of residential property may petition for a rent increase in excess of that provided in Section 6.20.040 in order to obtain a fair and reasonable return on their property. Such a fair return petition shall be on an application form prescribed by the City Manager and shall be decided by the City Manager, or their designee. The owner shall provide a copy of any fair return petition submitted to the City to the applicable tenant(s) and provide the City with proof of completing such service to the applicable tenant(s). The owner shall be responsible for accurately translating the return petition into the primary language(s) spoken by the applicable tenant(s). The tenant(s) will then have 30 days from the date of receiving the fair return petition to reply or provide additional materials to the City in response to the fair return petition. The owner shall bear the burden of establishing that a rate increase in excess of that provided in Section 6.20.040 is necessary to provide the owner with a fair and reasonable rate of return on their property, including by providing an independent financial report and verified financial data demonstrating that without such an increase the owner will not realize a fair and reasonable rate of return on their property.
      2. The owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with the City’s review of the fair return petition. Upon receipt of a fair return petition, the City Manager shall determine the anticipated costs of review and whether the employment of expert(s) will be necessary or appropriate for a proper analysis of the owner’s request. If the City Manager so determines, the City Manager shall also determine the anticipated costs of employing such expert(s). The resulting figure shall be communicated to the owner, and the fair return shall not be further processed until the owner has paid to the City the estimated cost of the complete analysis. The City shall provide owner with an invoice of all costs incurred after the review of the fair return petition. Any unused portion of this advance payment for analysis shall be refunded to the owner. If additional funds are required, payment of such funds shall be required before owner receives the determination on the fair return petition from the City.
      3. The factors the City Manager may consider in deciding a fair return petition may include, but not be limited to:
        1. Changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Area published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
        2. The length of time since the last determination by the City Manager on a rent increase application, or the last rent increase if no previous rent increase application has been made.
        3. The completion of any capital improvements or rehabilitation work related to the residential real property specified in the fair return petition, and the cost thereof, including materials, labor, construction interest, permit fees, and other items the City Manager deems appropriate.
        4. Changes in property taxes or other taxes related to the subject residential real property.
        5. Changes in the rent paid by the owner for the lease of the residential real property.
        6. Changes in the utility charges for the subject residential property paid by the owner, and the extent, if any, of reimbursement from the tenants.
        7. Changes in reasonable operating and maintenance expenses.
        8. The need for repairs caused by circumstances other than ordinary wear and tear.
        9. The amount and quality of services provided by the owner to the affected tenant(s).
      4. A fair return petition shall be decided by the City Manager within 60 calendar days of the date that the application has been deemed complete, including proof of service of the fair return petition on the applicable tenant(s). The decision shall be emailed and sent by mail, with proof of mailing to the subject property owner, the owner’s designated representative(s) for the fair return petition, the applicable tenant(s), and the designated representative of the tenant(s), if any. The decision shall be translated into the primary language(s) spoken by the applicable tenant(s).
      5. The City Council shall appoint a five-member rent review board consisting of two owners of residential property in Larkspur who actively rent property to residential tenants, two tenants of residential real property who reside in Larkspur, and one resident who is neither an owner of residential rental property nor a tenant of residential property. Members of the rent review board shall serve four-year terms and may be reappointed by the City Council.
        1. Within 30 calendars days of the City Manager’s decision on a fair return petition, the applicant or the affected tenants may file an appeal of the decision with the rent review board. A hearing on an appeal shall be held within 30 days of filing. The board may continue a hearing to obtain additional information relevant to the appeal. The board shall issue a written decision on an appeal within 30 days of closing the hearing. The decision of the City Manager shall be the final decision in the event of no appeal to the rent review board.
        2. By resolution, the City Council shall enact rules and regulations governing such appeal hearings.
        3. In deciding an appeal, the rent review board shall consider the factors listed in subsection (C) above, in addition to any others stated in the City Council resolution enacting rules and regulations for appeal hearings.
        4. On appeal, the rent review board may affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the City Manager.
      6.20.070 Exemptions.
      1. Pursuant to the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, the provisions of this chapter regulating the amount of rent that a residential real property owner may charge shall not apply to the following: any residential real property that has a certificate of occupancy issued after February 1, 1995 (Cal. Civil Code, Section 1954.52(a)(1)), and any other provisions of the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act addressing exemptions, as applicable.
      2. Pursuant to the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, Cal. Civil Code, Section 1947.12(d), the provisions of this chapter regulating the amount of rent that a residential real property owner may charge shall not apply to the following:
        1. Housing restricted by deed, regulatory restriction contained in an agreement with a government agency, or other recorded document as affordable housing for persons and families of very low, low or moderate income, as defined in Cal. Health and Safety Code, Section 50093 or comparable federal statutes.
        2. Dormitories owned and operated by an institution of higher education or a kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, school.
        3. Residential real property that is alienable, separate from the title to any other dwelling unit, provided that both of the following apply:
          1. The owner is not any of the following:
            1. A real estate investment trust, as defined in Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code.
            2. A corporation.
            3. A limited liability company in which at least one member is a corporation.
          2. At the time the tenancy is created:
            1. The tenants have been provided written notice that the residential real property is exempt from this section using the following statement:
              “This property is not subject to the rent limits imposed by Larkspur Municipal Code Chapter 6.20, and the owner is not any of the following: (1) a real estate investment trust, as defined by Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) a corporation; or (3) a limited liability company in which at least one member is a corporation.”
            2. For a tenancy existing before the effective date of this chapter, the notice required under Subsection (1) above may, but is not required to, be provided in the rental agreement.
            3. For a tenancy commenced or renewed on or after the effective date of this chapter, the notice required under Subsection (1) above must be provided in the rental agreement.
        4. A property containing two separate dwelling units within a single structure in which the owner occupied one of the units as the owner’s principal place of residence at the beginning of the tenancy so long as the owner continues in occupancy, and neither unit is an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit.
      3. The provisions of this chapter regulating the amount of rent that a residential real property owner may charge shall not apply to the following:
        1. A unit in a hotel, motel, inn, tourist home, or rooming and boarding house which is rented primarily to transient guests for a period of less than 30 days, and other transient occupancies as defined in Cal. Civil Code, Section 1940(b).
        2. A unit in an institutional facility, including a hospital, medical care facility, residential care facility, asylum, group home for seniors or the disabled; a rental unit in a transitional housing program that assists homeless persons as defined in Cal. Civil Code, Section 1954.12; a convent or monastery owned and operated by a religious organization; and a fraternity or sorority house affiliated with a college or university.
        3. A unit that the owner or the owner’s immediate family occupied as their principal place of residence at the beginning of the tenancy so long as the owner or the owner’s immediate family continues in occupancy.
        4. A unit permitted as an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU).
      6.20.080 Rent Increase Ineffective.

      No rent increase shall be effective if the owner:

      1. Fails to substantially comply with all provisions of this chapter, including but not limited to the failure to provide notices as required; or
      2. Fails to make repairs ordered by the City or court of competent jurisdiction
      3. Fails to make repairs ordered by the City or court of competent jurisdiction.
      6.20.090 Notice Requirements.
      1. An owner of any residential real property subject to this chapter shall, on or before the date of commencement of a tenancy, give the tenant a written notice in a form prescribed by the City which must include the following information:
        1. The existence and scope of this Chapter 6.20 of the City Code; and
        2. The tenant’s right to respond to any fair return petition filed with the City by the owner pursuant to Section 6.20.060.
      2. As part of any notice to increase rent, an owner must include:
        1. Notice of the existence of this Chapter 6.20 of the City Code; and
        2. The tenant’s right to respond to any fair return petition filed with the City by the owner and right to appeal a City Manager decision on a reasonable fair return petition pursuant to Section 6.20.060.
        3. No rent increase shall take effect until the requirements of this chapter have been met.
      3. When the owner and tenant have entered into a written lease, the owner must give notices to the tenant in the language used in the lease. When the owner and tenant have not entered into a written lease, the owner must give notices to the tenant in the language that the owner and tenant used to negotiate the terms of the tenancy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner must give notices to the tenant in the primary language spoken by the tenant, if known to the owner.
      6.20.100 Violations.
      1. It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of this chapter. The City may enforce and seek compliance with the provisions of this chapter using the criminal, civil, and administrative remedies set forth in Chapter 9.24 of this Code in addition to any other legal remedy available to the City. Any violation of any provision of this chapter may be subject to the criminal, civil, and administrative penalties set forth in Chapter 9.24 of this Code.
      2. Any owner who intentionally demands, accepts or retains any payment in violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be liable in a civil action to the tenant from whom such payment is demanded, accepted or retained for damages in the sum of three times the amount by which the payment demanded, accepted or retained exceeds the maximum amount which could be lawfully demanded, accepted or retained together with reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs as determined by the court.
      6.20.110 Fees Established.

      Owners subject to this chapter shall pay a rent stabilization program fee annually as established by City Council resolution. The rent stabilization program fee is to fund the City’s cost to implement and enforce the provisions of this Chapter.

      Section 3

      Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The approval of this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq., “CEQA,” and 14 Cal. Code Reg. §§ 15000 et seq., “CEQA Guidelines”). The rent stabilization regulations imposed by the adoption of this Ordinance are to prohibit increases in excess of a certain amount of rent on an annual basis; it is not a commitment to any particular action. As such, under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4), the regulations are not a project within the meaning of CEQA because it creates a regulatory mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15060 CEQA analysis is not required.

      Section 4

      Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

      Section 5

      Effective Date and Publication. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after it is adopted and shall be posted or published as required by State law.

      IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the Larkspur City Council held on September 6, 2023 and thereafter passed and adopted by the Larkspur City Council.

      AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
      Candell, Caroll, Mayor Paulson

      NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: Way

      ABSENT: None

      ABSTAIN: None

      s/ GABE PAULSON
      Mayor

      ATTEST:
      s/ SHANNON O’HARE
      Interim City Clerk

In-Person Voting

In-Person Voting

Vote at a Vote Center if you need a replacement ballot, did not register by February 20 deadline, prefer to vote in person or on an accessible ballot marking device. Voting is accessible at all locations.

AVOID LINES - Vote early or vote by mail

  • You may vote at any location,
  • See our List of Vote Centers for most recent Vote Center information, including hours of operation
  • Official Ballot Drop Boxes also at all Voter Center locations
  • Election Day March 5, all 21 Vote Centers open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Drop Box

Official Ballot Drop Box Locations

Open February 6 to March 5 until 8:00 p.m.

All Drop Boxes close precisely at 8:00 p.m. on Election Day as required by law

Exterior sites available for 24 hour drop off. Interior sites available during regular business hours, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. See our List of Drop Box Locations for days and hours of operation.

Each Vote Center will have a Vote by Mail Drop Box. See our List of Vote Centers Locations for days and hours of operation.

Important Notice

Important Notice

Secretary of State’s Voter Hotline (800) 345-VOTE (8683) - English

重要通知

州務卿選民熱線 (800) 339-2857 - 中文 / Chinese

AVISO IMPORTANTE

Línea directa para votantes del Secretario de Estado (800) 232-VOTA (8682) - Español / Spanish

THÔNG BÁO QUAN TRỌNG

Đường Dây Nóng Cử Tri của Ngoại Trưởng (800) 339-8163 - Việt ngữ / Vietnamese

Access/Language Needs

Access or Language Needs

Common Questions

Common Questions

Notice to Independent (NPP) Voters

Are you registered as No Party Preference?

If the answer is Yes, you will get a nonpartisan ballot that includes all races except party primary candidates for U.S. President.

The State of California contacted all parties about offering their party ballot to voters registered as No Party Preference (NPP). Parties determined the following:

NPP voters MAY request this party ballot:

  • American Independent Party
  • Democratic Party
  • Libertarian Party

NPP voters MAY NOT request this party ballot:

  • Green Party
  • Peace and Freedom Party
  • Republican Party

Online registration at www.registertovote.ca.gov, or call Elections Office at 415-473-6456 for a paper form.

Military/Over-Seas Voters

Military/Over-Seas Voters

Ballots go out January 19

  • Receiving your ballot by mail
    • Ballot packet includes this guide, ballot, instructions and postage-paid return envelope.
    • Your ballot must be postmarked on or before March 5 and received by March 12
      Date and sign your return envelope.
  • Receiving your ballot by email
    • You will receive an email from info@uocava.com with a link, access code, and instruction to access your ballot.
    • Ballot packet includes your voted ballot (must print), Oath of Voter form, return instructions, and postage-paid return envelope image.
    • Your ballot must be:
      • Emailed on or before March 5 by 8 pm.
      • Mailed - postmarked on or before March 5 and received by March 12

Vote By Mail Voters

Vote By Mail Voters

Ballots mailed starting February 5

All active registered voters will get a ballot in the mail. Allow 7-10 days for delivery.