2023 Election Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters, Elections

 

December 15, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, December 15, 2023, 9:30 a.m.
Civic Center Room 125 and Zoom

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Sean Peisert, Bob Richard

Representing the Elections Department: Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Michael Tellechea and Tony Aquilino, Technology Systems Specialists; Danny Straub and Elizabeth Iwamiya, Outreach Coordinators

Prospective Member: Stephanie Yarnovich

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending. She introduced Elizabeth Iwamiya who was hired to fill the vacancy left by Megan Stone. And, later in the meeting, introduced prospective member Stephanie Yarnovich attending on Zoom, who worked at one time in the Orange County elections department.

Outreach Update provided by Danny Straub

  • Receiving outreach material from the Secretary of State’s office
  • Updating in-house outreach materials for the March election
  • Reserved space for bus and print ads for both February and October 2024
  • Will schedule a meeting with Hearst to review digital outreach ads
  • Starting to post regularly on Facebook
  • Working on the second direct mailer that will include: Vote Center/Drop Box locations and hours; voter’s party affiliation (printed on the inside) so they can verify accuracy; QR code to take voters to language-specific information if needed
  • League of Women Voters of Marin has been invited to the County jail to hold a voter registration drive (presented the announcement flyer); Elections Department is a partner in this effort
  • Showed the PSA video regarding No Party Preference voting that is posted on Facebook and currently showing on local community TV
Discussion / Feedback
  • Regarding NPP voters, a member suggested creating a flow chart to diagram the process
  • Information about NPP voting is posted on the Secretary of State’s website; staff will update the Department’s website to include a link

Website Review

The County is redesigning its website and all departments will be switching to the new format by the end of 2024. The objective is to simplify websites and provide necessary information for the public, not provide a complete library of information. The new site will look more like mobile apps (view at marincounty.gov).

Discussion / Feedback

Committee members gave the following suggestions during a brainstorming session.

  • Eliminate multiple tables of contents; have general categories on the main page and then “drill down” to the details
  • Focus on the audience when creating categories; the majority of the audience in Marin County is generally an older population
  • Simplify; remove outdated information and use less text; include general information sheets about changes in election law; archive the detail for old information such as vote center model
  • The optimal number of categories is between 3-7; one member suggested considering 4-6 categories for the Elections Department
  • Prepare a storyboard to help design the new site
  • Make navigating easier (i.e., a more direct way to get back to the start)
  • Potential categories on the main page: “Voter”, “Candidate”, “Press” (meaning the media), “Poll Worker”, “Committees”, “How to Vote”, “Get Involved” (include information for observers), “Election Integrity”, “Election Security”, “Current Election”, “Historic Election Data”

2024 Election Cycle

Does the committee have any suggestions about what the Elections Department should consider going into the 2024 election cycle?

Discussion / Feedback
  • Anticipate heightened interest in election security and integrity
  • Educate the public – keep it simple; link to Secretary of State’s website
  • Promote the idea of reliable sources

Miscellaneous

For future consideration, one member suggested reviewing turnout at vote centers and consider relocating those that aren’t getting high turnout. Also, consider having a mobile vote center.

Member Robin Diederich mentioned that she is representing the League of Women Voters of Marin County as a member of the Secretary of State’s Voter’s Choice Act ambassador program, which serves as a community connection for elections and provides valuable information.

2024 Proposed Meeting Schedule
January Friday, January 19
February No meeting due to March election cycle
March No meeting due to March election cycle
April Friday, April 19
May Friday, May 17
June Friday, June 21
July Friday, July 21
August Friday, August 16
September Friday, September 20
October No meeting due to November election cycle
November No meeting due to November election cycle
December Friday, December 20

Meeting adjourned at 11:25 a.m. The next meeting will be held on Friday, January 19, 2024.

September 15, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, September 15, 2023, 9:30 a.m.
Civic Center Room 125 and Zoom

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Bob Richard, Steve Silberstein

Representing the Elections Department:
Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Greg Hayes, Logistics Manager; Michael Tellechea, Technology Systems Specialist; Danny Straub, Outreach Coordinator

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending.

Accessible Ballot Marking Device Cabinet

Greg Hayes reviwed the features and benefits of a secure cabinet for accessible ballot marking devices (BMDs). The cabinet is a prototype that Marin and Sonoma Counties are currently reviewing. Various people and organizations focused on accessibility have looked at the cabinet and provided feedback. The company plans to take the feedback and make additional modifications.

Unlike the current booths, the new cabinets have locking doors that provide added security. The BMD tablets and printers would be permanently housed in the cabinets so set-up by eleciton workers would be eliminated, and the cabinets would be easier for the mover when making deliveries to vote centers.

Discussion / Feedback

Not many voters in Marin County use the accessible BMDs currently, but federal and state law require this equipment to be available. Under the California Voter’s Choice Act, at least three units are required at each vote center. In addtion to providing a way for voters with disabilities to vote privately and independently, any voter may use a BMD and they are a good back-up if issues arise with the mobile ballot printing equipment.

The accessible equipment also serves seniors that may need large print and audio assistance.

Before purchasing these security cabinets, the department should consider the cost / benefit ratio. A member expressed concern about purchasing 60 or more cabinets for a “marginal imporvement” when the equipment does not get much use. Ms. Roberts pointed out that the department has grant funds that could most likely be used for the purchase. Mr. Hayes pointed out the potential for long-term cost savings by eliminating repairs to equipment that is damaged currently during deliveries to vote centers. The mover has given favorable feedback about using the cabinets.

A member suggested exploring a lease option instead of purchasing.

Perhaps the manufacturer can consider a red, white, and/or blue color scheme vs. the current black and gray.

The department could conduct a pilot program by using a cabinet at a vote center in the March 2024 election.

Security FAQ

Election workers at vote centers have asked for more information about election processes to assist voters with questions. Michael Tellechea is developing a short FAQ about voting at a vote center, voting by mail, and how ballot counting (tabulation) works. The FAQ focuses on the security aspects of these procedures. He simplified the concepts as much as possible to make it easy for election workers to explain and combat misinformation.

The intent is to give the FAQ to election workers; however, staff is considering making this document available to the public.

Discussion / Feedback

A member suggested including this information with the vote-by-mail packet. Another suggested reorganizing the content to focus on vote-by-mail first since this is how most people in Marin County vote. Also, emphasize BallotTrax and signature verification to address common concerns about stolen ballots and people voting twice.

In addition to sending the FAQ with ballots, staff could include this in the voter information guide.

Regarding vote centers, it would be helpful if eleciton workers talk through the check-in process while assisting a voter so the voter understands what is happening. Mr. Tellechea can emphasize this in election worker training.

Outreach Updates

Lynda Roberts and Danny Straub reviewed draft copies of a direct mailer that will be sent to all registered voters by the end of October.

Discussion / Feedback

Members suggested keeping the red, white, and blue color scheme. The message should focus on party information and the importance of checking one’s party affiliation so they get the ballot they want to vote on in March. Also, information about party affiliation could be added to the department’s website.

Follow-up from April meeting

Ms. Roberts reviewed feedback from the April meeting:

  • Accessible phone features: The department has a TTY phone in the office and the phone number is included on an information card availble to voters at vote centers.
  • Outreach role of the Voter Education and Outreach Advisory Committee (VEOAC): Staff is discussing the possibility of holding quarterly meetings with the VEOAC like they do with the Language Accessibility Advisory Committee and Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee (LAAC & VAAC).
  • Change the term “live” ballot: Using the word “live” is an internal “shorthand” for staff so we will continue to use the term but will modify the label printed at vote center check-in stations to say “Live/Vote Here” so the meaning of the term is better defined.
  • Develop FAQ about security and reassuring voters that content on in-person ballots and VBM ballots is the same: The new security FAQ reviewed earlier in the meeting addresses these concerns.

Miscellaneous

Danny Straub and Robin Diederich talked about the event planned at the Civic Center for National Voter Registration Day, which is Tuesday, September 19. The Elections Department and League of Women Voters of Marin County are co-hosting the event. Tables will be set up in the South Archway (Peter Behr Drive) and Middle Archway (Hall of Justice) to assist people and answer questions about registering to vote. Lynda Roberts will be present from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the South Archway to answer questions.

Mr. Straub attended the naturalization ceremony in Point Reyes on September 13 to assist people with voter registration. About a quarter of those in attendance registered to vote.

The meeting adjourned at 11:35 a.m.

July 28, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, July July 28, 2023, 9:30 AM
Warehouse Tour

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Tom Montgomery, Sean Peisert, Bob Richard, Steve Silberstein, Jenny Sowry

Representing the Elections Department: Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Megan Stone, Elections Technician; Greg Hayes, Logistics Manager; Tony Aquilino, Technology Systems Specialist

Visitor: Ron Elijah

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending.

Warehouse Tour

Greg Hayes conducted the tour. The Elections Department stores equipment at the warehouse that includes accessible ballot marking devices, vote center ballot boxes, vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes, mobile ballot printing equipment, voting booths, emergency lamps, cones, chairs, tables, accessibility ramps and other mitigation supplies, and miscellaneous items such as empty boxes to store ballot materials for the required retention period.

During election time, the logistics team stages the vote center equipment for pick-up at the warehouse and a moving company delivers everything to the vote centers. No ballots are processed at the warehouse; all ballot processing is done at the Civic Center.

Mr. Hayes showed the committee the secure cabinet in which mobile ballot printers are stored for each vote center and he reviewed the process of retrieving vote-by-mail ballots from drop boxes. He also reviewed the secure features of the drop boxes.

Staff answered questions.

The meeting adjourned at 11:20 a.m.

June 16, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, June 16, 2023, 9:30 AM
Hybrid Meeting (in person and Zoom)

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Veda Florez, Bonnie Glaser, Tom Montgomery, Bob Richard, Steve Silberstein, Jenny Sowry, Cat Woods

Representing the Elections Department: Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Megan Stone, Elections Technician; Danny Straub, Elections Technician

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending.

The purpose of this special meeting was to discuss Assembly Bill 1416 (Santiago, 2022), also known as the Ballot DISCLOSE Act.

Assembly Bill 1416

Ms. Roberts summarized the bill and the impacts it would have at the local level.

Assembly Bill (AB) 1416 was passed by the Legislature in 2022 and adds a requirement that a list of supporters and opponents of each statewide and local measure be included on the ballot. Lists of supporters and opponents are limited to 125 characters each – including spaces, commas, semicolons, and other characters, and can include associations, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals taken from the signers or the text of the supporting and opposing arguments. This would not be a list of big-money donors supporting or opposing statewide or local measures. The author’s office conducted a survey, but there was no research conducted on how voters may actually respond to having more information on the ballot.

Elections Code § 9170(d) allows for counties to opt out of this requirement at the local level for countywide, municipal, school, and special district measures. The requirement would be maintained for statewide measures.

The Legislature did not provide funding to reimburse counties for implementing AB 1416. Opting out of AB 1416, as permitted for local measures, will realize cost savings depending on the number of local measures on the ballot; the amount of staff time/overtime required to enforce compliance with the new law; the amount of staff time/overtime required to prepare the information for the ballot and sample ballot; and the potential for an additional ballot card, which would cost approximately $72,000.

Marin’s neighboring counties of Contra Costa, Sonoma, and Napa have voted to opt out. Counties can choose to opt back in.

Ms. Roberts reviewed concerns that are shared by many other registrars around the state:

  • Possible impact on the number of ballot cards (additional costs if measure is pushed to another card).
  • Printing the lists is likely to politicize the ballot by increasing the possibility of electioneering and promotion of candidates who may be on the ballot and are also signers of the measure.
  • The non-partisan nature of local elections would change by printing the lists.
  • No additional time has been built into the already tight time limit to accommodate this inclusion.
  • This could be an additional reason for legal challenges and/or writs which impact the printing and mailing of the voting material.
  • The sample ballot booklet already provides thorough supporter and opponent information through direct arguments and rebuttal arguments.
  • There would be more data input, more proofreading, and more translation which will impact staff time, including overtime costs.
  • It doesn’t appear that counties can claim reimbursement from the state for this additional language.
  • Voter information guide and ballot would be inconsistent due to 125-character limitation.
  • Costs for the county and local jurisdictions would increase.
  • A county will not include the list if a neighboring county that shares districts opts out.

On the last point, Ms. Roberts mentioned that Marin County shares several districts with Sonoma County.

Discussion

Committee members discussed the perceived benefits and concerns of the bill. A benefit would be to provide transparency and assist voters by having some limited information on the ballot about who supports and opposes a local measure. However, this would not be information about top donors, which is really what people want to know.

Perceived concerns include potential cost and difficulty of administering the new law and translating abbreviated information into other languages; potential confusion with multiple ballot cards or “clutter” on the ballot; and the possibility of politicizing local ballots or promoting electioneering on the ballot. Statewide ballots are already long and blocks of text can be intimidating. One member asked: Does this add much value for the additional time and cost?

After the discussion, Ms. Roberts conducted an informal poll: Six members thought it was a good idea to include the additional information on the ballot regardless of potential cost and evaluate the impact later. Four members thought it was a good idea to opt out first and evaluate the impact after upcoming elections since the complete information is already in the voter guide.

The Board of Supervisors will consider opting out of AB 1416 on July 18. Information from this committee meeting will be included in the staff report.

The meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.

The next meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 28, 2023, 9:30-11:30 a.m. at the Elections Department warehouse.

April 21, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, April 21, 2023, 9:30 AM
Hybrid Meeting (in person and Zoom)

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Bonnie Glaser, Sean Peisert, Bob Richard

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Bonnie Glaser, Sean Peisert, Bob Richard

Visitor: Pat Becker, League of Women Voters of Marin County

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending.

Voter’s Choice Act—Election Administration Plan Revisions

The Voter’s Choice Act requires a review of the Election Administration Plan (EAP), which includes the outreach and education plan, two years after implementation, and then every four years. Ms. Roberts, Ms. Stone and Mr. Straub presented the revised draft.

Discussion

Members made several suggestions: Explore accessible phone features such as text speech, text braille, and translations via a QR code; add footnotes in the EAP to explain certain terms; ensure that members of the Voter Education and Outreach Advisory Committee are clear about their role; consider changing the term “live” ballots to in-person or Vote Center ballots; consider developing an FAQ about election security; consider ways to reassure voters that the content on their in-person ballot and vote-by-mail ballot is the same.

Mr. Tellechea responded to technical and security questions:

  • All Vote Center laptops have a unique password; additional security measures, such as two-factor authentication, would require each laptop to have a cell phone. Security would be reduced if a phone is lost or misplaced. If a worker misplaces the unique password, tech support can reset the password remotely. The current procedure maintains balance between security and disruptions to voting.
  • Ballot marking devices (BMDs) are certified by the Secretary of State; the equipment is stand-alone and not connected to, or related to, other equipment at the Vote Center, such as check-in computers. The BMDs have a back-up power supply if needed.
  • Check-in computers access the voter database through a virtual private network (VPN), which is a secure “tunnel” to the County network. Voter index computers also use the VPN to allow the public to see a list of those who have and have not voted, as required by law. All other Vote Center equipment is stand-alone and is not connected to the VPN. Prior to an election, the tech team conducts a survey to determine the best location in a Vote Center for the VPN router. The department uses both AT&T and Verizon for access to the best service.
  • Regarding “proof” that Vote Center equipment is not connected to the internet, Vote Center coordinators are trained to address this concern by showing people the connection to the laptop. Computers are disabled so they cannot access Wi Fi, blue tooth, etc. A Vote Center coordinator can physically demonstrate that ballot marking devices and mobile ballot printers are not connected to external sources. A coordinator could also minimize the screen on the laptop computers to show there is no icon for internet connection.
  • The Elections Department is able to communicate with Vote Center coordinators using a county-issued cell phone or their personal cell phone.
  • Regarding power issues, the department can restore access using a generator, a universal power supply for ballot marking devices, or voters may use sample ballots to vote until power is restored. Counties are required to provide an emergency plan to the Secretary of State before each election.
  • The Vote Center model has helped improve efficiency during the canvass period following the election. Also, election workers have seen improvements with the new model, such as the check-in computers that provide real-time access to a voter’s status and eliminates the need for voters to surrender their vote-by-mail ballot.

The outreach team pointed out that revisions include differentiating between outreach needs for statewide and local special elections. Language has been refined so outreach efforts are scalable depending on the type of election.

Ms. Roberts outlined the next steps:

  • Advisory committees will be able to provide feedback on the revised plan until May 5.
  • The revised draft will then be sent to the Secretary of State for review.
  • The public review period will be scheduled during the summer.

Outreach Collaborations

Mr. Straub reviewed outreach collaborations he is working on with the Probation Department Career Explorers Program, which is focused on youth internships. He will participate in the guest speaker series and talk about registering to vote and voting. The Clean Slate Program is another opportunity to interact with multiple organizations and provide information.

Mr. Straub mentioned an effort that he is working on with Pat Becker from the League of Women Voters of Marin County to create an outreach network with law enforcement agencies to restore voting rights to people who are no longer incarcerated. This effort includes the Probation Department and the Public Defender’s Office.

Much of the work is an effort to reach people who may otherwise “fall through the cracks.”

Youth Town Hall

Ms. Stone reviewed plans for the Youth Town Hall scheduled for Sunday, April 23. The event was organized by two of the participants in the Student Elections Ambassador Program who serve as junior members on the ambassador steering committee. The Student Elections Ambassador Program is sponsored by the Marin County Elections Department, League of Women Voters of Marin County, and Marin County Office of Education.

The event will start with a welcome message from Dr. Shirley Weber, Secretary of State, and the panel will consist of mayors and council members from around the county. Students will have the opportunity to ask questions. About forty people have signed up so far. The IJ printed an article about the event and the County issued a news release. The League of Women Voters also shared information on social media.

Miscellaneous

A member suggested scheduling election security as an upcoming topic.

The next meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 28, 2023, 9:30-11:30 a.m. for a tour of the Elections Department warehouse.

Meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.

March 17, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, March 17, 2023, 9:30 AM
Zoom Meeting

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Bonnie Glaser, Anne Layzer, Tom Montgomery, Sean Peisert, Bob Richard, Steve Silberstein

Representing the Elections Department: Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Megan Stone, Elections Technician; Danny Straub, Elections Technician

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending. Ms. Roberts let the committee know that Anne Layzer was stepping down. She thanked Ms. Layzer for serving on the committee since its inception and for her support and dedication. Ms. Layzer referred to her years of civic service and said it has been most important that people can participate in the voting process.

Voter’s Choice Act—Election Administration Plan revisions

The Voter’s Choice Act requires a review of the Election Administration Plan that includes the outreach and education plan (EAP) two years after implementation, and then every four years. Ms. Roberts, Ms. Stone and Mr. Straub are working on a revised draft with assistance from Liz Acosta, who was the project leader during the 2019-2021 implementation phase.

Ms. Roberts reviewed the process and timeline:

  • Advisory committees will have an opportunity to review the first draft and provide feedback.
  • A preview copy will be sent to the Secretary of State for feedback before holding the public workshop.
  • The department plans to hold the public workshop during the summer and will post a copy of the revised draft online for the required 14-day public comment period prior to the workshop.
  • The final version will be posted online and submitted to the Secretary of State for approval by the September 7 deadline.

Ms. Stone and Mr. Straub will revise the outreach/education portion of the EAP and will incorporate lessons learned from the 2022 election cycle and the recent March 2023 local election. They will consider a proportional response to outreach/education based on the type of election, which will provide flexibility and allow the team to properly scale their efforts. Feedback from the advisory committees about changes will be important.

Update about Student Elections Ambassador Program (SEAP)

Ms. Stone provided updates. Two ambassadors were invited last fall to function as liaisons and participate on the steering committee that includes the League of Women Voters and Marin County Office of Education. The liaisons suggested holding an in-person youth town hall that would allow participants to network with other young people and local officials. The event is scheduled for Sunday, April 23, 2-4 p.m. in the Civic Center Board of Supervisors chambers and will include snacks and giveaways. Many local mayors will be participating on a panel.

Ms. Stone will email program details to the Elections Department advisory committees, and requests that committee members share the information with their networks to promote the event. Student ambassadors will share event information with their peers.

Questions/Comments

May anyone attend? The event is focused on teens and young adults, but the board chambers can accommodate 200 people.

Are the organizers aware that April 23 is a massive Earth Day event at the Mill Valley Community Center? The youth town hall has been organized by the two ambassador liaisons and they specifically chose the weekend of Earth Day believing it to be the best day to target teens and young adults. The Elections Department is lending support for their effort.

There is a national non-profit called The Civics Center doing the same work as the student ambassador program. They are registering young people and educating them about how to vote and complete a ballot.

The League of Women Voters of Marin County monthly member meeting is scheduled for April 3 via Zoom and will focus on the Student Elections Ambassador Program. Anyone is welcome to attend: LWVMC April Member Meeting, Monday, April 3, 11:30am-1:00pm.

Zoom link to register: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0vcemhpz8jHNd8cQG0ihOwekA_HK3i3CLU

New observer packet and ballot flowchart

Ms. Roberts reviewed the new observer packet and ballot flowchart. Jenny Sowry revised and expanded the previous handouts to make a more complete booklet for in-office election observers. Staff carefully reviewed the ballot flowchart for accuracy. Creating a detailed flowchart was intentional based on observers’ questions from the November 2022 election. A framed poster of the flowchart is hanging in the main office. The intent of the new booklet and flowchart is to provide more comprehensive information about ballot processing and additional transparency. A laminated copy of the flowchart will be posted in the sorter area and copies will be available at the front counter for observers to take.

A simplified version of the flowchart will be created for posting online. The team will ask for committee feedback prior to finalizing the chart.

Questions/Comments

The web version of the ballot flowchart could include 5-6 boxes with the basic information and details could be provided by clicking on each box. There could be a link to the PDF version of the chart. There are some suggestions from Adobe to make PDFs accessible: https://www.adobe.com/accessibility/pdf/pdf-accessibility-overview.html

One member suggested reviewing the wording on page 13 of the booklet regarding adjudication—it may be confusing as written.

In the flowchart, it would be good to have a glossary that defines key words like "challenged ballot", "challenged envelope signature" and "extraction and inspection".

Overview of Senate Bill 504 passed in 2022

Ms. Roberts reviewed two aspects of the bill.

First, qualified military and overseas voters and voters with disabilities may complete a conditional voter registration (CVR) and cast a provisional ballot starting 14 days prior to an election through 8 p.m. on Election Day. Before this bill was enacted, conditional voter registration had to be done in person, which eliminated the option for those unable to do so. With this new law, the department can offer CVR using the remote accessible vote by mail (RAVBM) option. SB 504 was passed as an urgency bill so this new option was available during the 2022 election cycle. The process allows people to register online and instructs them to notify their registrar of voters that they need a CVR ballot. After the voter registration form is processed, the department sends the voter a link to the RAVBM ballot. If a voter contacts the department prior to registering, staff will walk them through the steps. Some Marin County voters used this method during 2022.

Second, counties are now required to notify persons who have been released from imprisonment that their voting rights are restored. The Secretary of State prepared a form letter for this purpose. The workflow is as follows:

  1. On a weekly basis, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation provides the Secretary of State with information identifying persons imprisoned for conviction of a felony and persons on parole.
  2. The Secretary of State provides county elections officials with information about matching registration records.
  3. Elections officials will cancel voter registration of those imprisoned and notify those who are eligible to re-register.

So far, the Marin County Elections Department has received zero updates from the Secretary of State.

Miscellaneous

The department will certify the March 7 Special Election on March 24. Voters have until March 22 by 5 p.m. to correct a signature problem on their ballot envelope.

The next meeting is scheduled for Friday, April 21, 2023, 9:30-11:30 a.m. in person at the Civic Center, Room 125.

The meeting adjourned at 10:30 a.m.

February 17, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, February 17, 2023, 9:30 AM
Zoom Meeting

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Veda Florez, Anne Layzer, Bob Richard, Steve Silberstein, Jenny Sowry

Representing the Elections Department: Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Megan Stone, Elections Technician; Danny Straub, Elections Technician; Dan Miller, Sr. Program Coordinator

Visitors: Jan King, League of Women Voters of Marin County

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending.

Candidate Filing Process – Dan Miller, Presenter

Mr. Miller reviewed the candidate filing process, which he has managed for 12 years. He highlighted the following:

  • A few years ago, regularly-scheduled local elections changed from odd to even years and are now held with the gubernatorial and presidential election cycles.
  • This change increased the amount of work during the candidate filing period and now close to 500 local candidates file for the November general elections.
  • Candidates for municipal offices file with city clerks but Mr. Miller helps process the candidates by checking signatures on their nomination papers.
  • The March 2024 election is a presidential primary and will include party nominated offices, which are presidential candidates and local party central committees.
  • Candidates running for a salaried office are required to pay a filing fee and can choose to offset the cost by gathering signatures-in-lieu of filing fee. This process will start in September 2023 for the March 2024 primary election. These signatures can also count towards the nomination signatures. All candidates are required to gather nomination signatures.
  • The deadline to file nomination papers for the March 2024 primary is December 8. The deadline will be extended five days to December 13 if an incumbent doesn’t file.
  • The Secretary of State’s office processes state and federal candidates.
Questions/Comments
  • In response to a question about contact information for candidates, Mr. Miller said candidates are notified that they need to provide contact information for the media and the public. He will work on requiring an email address and will work with city clerks to encourage them to gather more contact information; however, he can’t require cities to conform to county procedures. People can contact him directly for the information.
  • In response to a question about the 2024 primary election candidate guidebook, Mr. Miller said the guidebook will be posted online in late August. The list of open seats will be posted before then.
  • Ms. Roberts pointed out that Assembly Bill 759, passed in 2022, moved the election of the district attorney and the sheriff to the presidential primary election cycle starting in 2028.

Signature Cure Letters (for missing or mismatched signatures on vote-by-mail ballot envelopes)

This discussion was continued from the January 20, 2023, meeting. Ms. Roberts reviewed the packet of information she emailed in advance to committee members. The packet included a copy of the out-going and return envelopes, a copy of the “cure” letters, and a copy of the notices posted online. The Elections Code outlines the wording that is required to be in the letters and notices. Ms. Roberts also reviewed a chart showing the number of ballots that were in challenge status after several elections (2014-2022), and the reasons the ballots remained challenged.

Questions/Comments
  • The outgoing envelope could be a different color or have a message printed on it, such as, “immediate response needed” or “action required for your ballot to count”. This might help get a voter’s attention.
  • The paragraphs in the letters are lengthy and voters may not read them thoroughly. The letters may be more readable by changing the format and making important messages stand out, such as, “I understand that my failure to sign this statement means that my ballot will be invalidated.”
  • If voters are signed up for Ballot Trax, they get a message after signature verification telling them their ballot is either accepted or challenged. Voters have responded positively to getting a message.
  • The Elections Department typically does not have time for multiple outreach efforts during a busy election. However, in November 2022, Ms. Stone had time to follow-up with voters if their cure letter still had a mismatched signature. This helped resolve a few of the problems. The League of Women Voters also helps alert voters and the department appreciates their support.
  • Perhaps the department can post a statement online or on social media that a ballot with a signature issue can still be counted if the voter acts and returns the cure letter.
  • The department may want to consider outreach efforts encouraging voters to use a ballot drop box rather than mailing the ballot back if it is close to Election Day.
  • The outreach team is considering options to encourage people to return ballots earlier. One new strategy is to switch from reminding them about Election Day, which sounds like the only day to vote, to saying the “last day to vote is….”
  • Perhaps the department could add a message on outreach postcards or in the voter information guide about paying attention to follow-up mail from the Elections Department.

Miscellaneous

Ms. Roberts said the four short videos that were made for the November 2022 election are now posted online in our video gallery.

The next meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 17, 2023, 9:30-11:30 a.m. via Zoom. Ms. Roberts will send the link closer to the meeting date. The April meeting will be held in person at the Civic Center, Room 125.

The meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.

January 20, 2023

Registrar of Voters
Election Advisory Committee Meeting
Friday, January 20, 2023, 9:30 AM
Zoom Meeting

Minutes

Attendees

Becky Bingea, Greg Brockbank, Robin Diederich, Cathleen Dorinson, Veda Florez, Bonnie Glaser, Tom Montgomery, Steve Silberstein, Jenny Sowry

Representing the Elections Department: Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters; Melvin Briones, Assistant Registrar; Danny Straub, Elections Technician

Welcome

Lynda Roberts opened the meeting and thanked everyone for attending. She introduced two new members, Becky Bingea and Jenny Sowry, and invited them to give a brief overview of their interest in the committee.

Ms. Bingea started attending meetings as a member of the public out of general interest. Her attendance helps in her role as a board member of the League of Women Voters of Marin County by providing a broader perspective.

Ms. Sowry has worked in the Elections Department in various capacities since 2000. Becoming a member of the committee supports her interest in civic matters and desire to stay engaged with the elections process.

Maintenance of Voter Registration Database

Ms. Roberts introduced the topic by giving a basic overview of Elections Code sections.

  • Voter registration maintenance is governed by Elections Code (EC) sections 2200-2227
  • Per Elections Code section 2201, registrations are canceled for the following reasons:
    • Voter request
    • Voter found to be mentally incompetent by a court
    • Proof that the person is imprisoned for conviction of a felony
    • At the direction of a certified copy of a judgment
    • Death of voter
    • Notification that person is registered in another state
    • Proof that the person is otherwise ineligible
  • EC 2205-2206: Notices of deaths come from county registrar of deaths and/or state Department of Health Services
  • EC 2208-2211: Outlines process for determining incompetency; notices come from court
  • EC 2212: Outlines procedures regarding convicted felons; notices come from Secretary of State
  • Residency Confirmation Procedures (EC 2220-2227)
    • EC 2220-2221: Procedure regarding residency confirmation postcard
    • EC 2222: May use National Change of Address (NCOA) system In lieu of EC 2220, which is what the Marin County Elections Department follows
    • EC 2224: Send postcard if voter has not voted in four years; this section became inoperative on 1/1/2020
    • EC 2223 and 2225: Address correction service based on change of address (COA) data from USPS
    • EC 2226: Maintenance actions based on COA information
      • Update record (i.e., new address)
      • Make voter inactive due to undeliverable mail
      • Voters in the inactive status: If voter fails to respond to address verification mailing (EC 2225) and doesn’t vote in two federal general elections, the registration is cancelled

Mr. Briones reviewed procedures in more detail.

  • The election management system (EMS) constantly “talks” with VoteCal (the state voter registration database). For example, if a voter re-registers in another California county, the system automatically cancels the registration in Marin County.
  • A lot of record maintenance happens automatically in the background between the local EMS and VoteCal.
  • The Elections Department receives NCOA information from the Secretary of State (SOS) via VoteCal (the SOS contracts with the post office). The department is notified monthly about address changes (i.e., moves within the county, within the state, and out of state).
  • In-county address changes: The department sends a postcard so the voter can confirm the move.
  • Out-of-state address changes: The voter record is made inactive and the department sends a postcard to confirm the move. If the voter returns the card confirming the move, the registration is canceled.
  • When cards come back as undeliverable, the voter record is made inactive.
  • When the department receives a change of address through DMV, the department sends a Third-Party Change of Address card to verify the change (3PCOA).
  • When vote-by-mail ballots or outreach mailings are returned with a change of address or undeliverable, the department follows the NCOA procedures.
  • Regarding deceased voters, the department receives information monthly from the state and the county vital statistics office. However, these two sources only report people who die within the county.
  • Major record “clean-up” is done in odd years. For example, in 2021 the department contacted all inactive voters via a confirmation card. If these inactive voters don’t vote during two federal elections (2022 or 2024), the registrations will be cancelled in 2025.
Questions/Comments/Discussion

On average, how may COAs does the department process?

  • About 800-1,000 per month, which would be generated from NCOA—either people notifying the post office that they moved, or undeliverable mail.

How many new registrations does the department receive per month?

  • About 50-80 per day during the slow time. This is mostly re-registration to change party affiliation or voter’s name. Prior to an election, registration goes up to about 500 per day.

How many annual new registrations does the department process?

  • Possibly 3,000 per year.

The COA process saves voters the trouble of having to re-register, which is a service to them. Many states require people to actively re-register.

How many changes come from the DMV?

  • Approximately 5-10 per day; many of them overlap with NCOA. The main source of registration is through DMV; these registrations are processed through VoteCal.

If a voter moves to California, is their registration in the other state cancelled?

  • The Elections Department will send a notice to the other state’s Secretary of State if the new registration gives information about prior registration.

What happens when someone moves within the state?

  • The update is made by VoteCal automatically

Will California be notified if someone dies out of state?

  • The state gets information from the Social Security Administration, so eventually it filters down and updates are made by matching information (i.e., name, date of birth, social security number). However, the social security number is not required when a person registers, so the voter’s record doesn’t show up unless there is a 100% match.

Mr. Briones reviewed a copy of the verification card (8D2) that is sent to voters by the Elections Department to confirm changes.

What happens with records of those no longer active?

  • All voter registration records are contained in one database, including active, inactive and cancelled. If cancelled records are deleted from the database, they are still maintained in VoteCal.

When the department is notified about the death of a voter by a third party, the record goes to inactive status and the department sends a letter to the household to confirm. The record isn’t cancelled until the information is verified.

Data from VoteCal shows that Marin County has some registered voters that are over 100 years old. How is this explained? Can this be clarified with voters?

  • In the past, the date of birth was not required for a person to register. When that changed, a default date was used for the older registrations.

What happens if the department doesn’t get the required information on the registration form?

  • Required information includes date of birth, citizenship, residence address, and signature. The voter can’t complete an online registration if they don’t provide all the information. When they submit a paper registration with missing information, the form is entered into the system as pending and then the department sends a letter requesting the missing information. The record is not processed unless the voter provides the missing information.

What happens at a vote center if the person is pending?

  • The voter would complete a conditional voter registration (CVR) and vote provisionally.

Can anyone question another person’s registration?

  • At a vote center, only election workers can challenge a voter per Elections Code.
  • If a person contacts the department and challenges a person’s registration, the department relies on the information submitted by the voter on their registration form, which the voter signs under penalty of perjury.
  • A person can also follow a legal procedure and present evidence to the District Attorney that the voter committed perjury.

Signature Cure Letters (for missing or mismatched signatures on vote-by-mail ballot envelopes)

Ms. Roberts outlined the process for sending letters after a thorough signature verification check, which includes at least three different reviews. The Elections Code requires letters to be sent within 24 hours

Questions/Comments/Discussion
  • What does the letter look like?
  • Does the envelope have the Election Mail logo printed on it?
  • Can the advisory committee get statistics about signature problems for the last few elections?
  • The League of Women Voters generally is concerned about this issue.
  • How many matching points on a signature does the sorter look at?
  • DMV signatures are very problematic when people use just a wavy line as a signature.
  • Ballot Trax notifies people when their ballot has been challenged, so it is important to keep promoting the service.
  • It is important for voters to check their status. The off-cycle year (2023) would be a good time for this kind of outreach.

Ms. Roberts will schedule a more in-depth review of this issue for the next meeting.

Miscellaneous

Ms. Roberts asked for feedback about returning to in-person meetings. Members discussed possibilities including hybrid meetings and alternating between in-person and virtual.

The next meeting is scheduled for Friday, February 17, 2023, 9:30-11:30 a.m. via Zoom. Ms. Roberts will send the link closer to the meeting date.

The meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.